Looks at turret baskets
1 Like
Well that was complete BS.
But this topic is about loadings.
And yes, I’m still happy on my clicks 5s reload.
1 Like
Tbh I wasn’t answering you, just finding it ridiculous that they haven’t been added to other MBTs yet, and how it’s a nerf without a buff but fair.
NATO has turret baskets; Russia doesn’t? I’m a bit confused by this, you could be telling me to I’m stupid or agreeing and I don’t know which tbf lol
The coping is the constant nerfs to NATO vehicles and buffs to Russian ones. As well as outright fantasy vehicles, missiles, and stats. But because you benefit from it, it’s fine.
NATO has turret baskets which don’t function the way they do IRL. Who create spall rather than catch it, and block horizontal when they shouldn’t NATO tanks also get artificial gun depression nerfs, when there’s tons of pictures showing NATO tanks don’t magically aim upwards over the sides and co.
Meanwhile Russia has “magic wet ammo rack carousels” according to moderators for bug reports, Russian diesel that’s less likely to explode, and so on and on.
11 Likes
Since the gun doesn’t raise in game it should be lowered to 5 seconds for autoloading as gaijin skips that.
1 Like
“Since they don’t model a weakness of the tank, it should get a buff on top of a buff.”
But if you have any document showing that if you lose half of a T-80B’s gun and its variants during a fight, it can still fire with 100% accuracy and without needing repairs, please share it with the dev team. We’d be very grateful to make the game as close to reality as possible (for Russia and China).
If you have any documents showing clear improvements to NATO vehicles, we’ll analyze them very carefully, and in a maximum of 5 to 10 years we might start closed testing for an implementation 15 years from now, with the risk of it never coming to the game due to a lack of solid evidence.
1 Like
I have a paper napkin I found saying Russian armor for T-series tanks has an effective thickness of 2000mm. And that their ammunition is actually guided, allowing them to shoot down planes with ease. Does that count?
1 Like
OF COURSE! Please send us the document so we can fix this huge armor deficiency issue on the mentioned vehicles. We’re always available to correct mistakes (especially for the Russia and China nations) in the game.
1 Like
Create a bug report and it will be fixed in a week.
1 Like
Iirc the cyclograms do include raising and lowering the gun to the neutral position, so the reload would still be the same(if i am not mistake they use the gun stabilizer speed on this step not the sight aimning speed).
Lets be honest, Every modern tank is reloading faster then what they should be usually. Autoloading tanks not needing to set the gun and such and manual loaders loading in “perfect” conditions.
Turret baskets are an artificial nerf (kinda) Mainly because there are fail safes in modern tanks that would allow the turret to keep turning without the “Hydraulic lines and electrical Lines” Being damaged.
But to mainly ask/say. Autoloaders main selling point is keeping the same firing speed no matter what, Along with not being connected to the turret itself so it could stay moving.
Manual loaders main selling point is having a faster fire rate Undamaged and having better Crew “Survivability” technically.
What Would be the best way to balance both of these so players from such nations don’t feel their getting cheated?
Mainly gonna say nato problems but you get the gist.
Like would having Abrams loaders where full Kevlar to better protect themselves from shrapnel work?
Maybe making the actual Turret basket a bootleg one use spall liner instead of a pure negative?
Adding the failsafes to all tanks that had them?
Lets be honest, Every modern tank is reloading faster then what they should be usually. Autoloading tanks not needing to set the gun and such and manual loaders loading in “perfect” conditions.
Yeah, no. Untrue. Several tanks are reloading SLOWER than they should.
Which ones might i ask. (Not comin at ya, mainly curious lol)
Depending on the situation pretty much all human loaders, on static firing they certanly can reload faster
Yes, I understand this. However in his case I don’t know if he’s calling it an unfair Nerf to NATO or if it’s suggested that the Turret Baskets are fair or something and I’m stupid for making my argument.
average gaijin apologist
Nerf t58, hstvl, rdf, sav, somua, surbaise, strv104, type 90, msc, m1128, and pt16 aswell then?
Russia having a reload to finally match up with other countries in top tier making them competitive, atleast china had a reverse gear if their shot was messed up but now russia can fight back just aswell as a leopard just with still missing spall liner, insta crew death fuel tanks and a upf pennable by anything with 500mm