Oh god,
Another complete BS topic from biggest basebombing bot ever.
Cant wait when this guy starts using AI on post, these allready are AI approved takes…
Or AI is learning from tigers topics.
What is next take?
Ir launching helos should be 11.7 or 12.3.
Terminator should be 9.3
Bases should be closer so you could bomb in IRIAF more easily, and should be dropped to 12.3 ?
If you are complaning about russian tanks being BAD, then maybe it is time to reconsider playing the game. The devs are literally biased towards Russia. BMPT is clear proof of that. T-80 is probably the most indestructible tank in that BR. No IFV can just kill russian tanks, while other nations get cooked front back and side from 8.0 to 10.7.
I am starting to believe that this guy just hops on the game, tries to bomb with jets or hold w right into the enemy tanks depending on the gamemode and then make a thread about whatever vehicle killed him and call it op or call the vehicle he was using bad.
Somewhere on Pluto maybe. But on Earth there is t80ud which is better in almost every way and at same br. Lack of thermals can be compensated by researching eyes modification in most cases
They don’t really need to. They are bad vehicles but recompressing the game is not a good idea.
1989 is trash.
2S38 is mediocre, and its going to 10.7.
BMP-2M is garbage, and i’m tired of people pretending its overpowered. You are slower than MBTs. IFVs beyond 9.7 are simply not good.
Strela is an SPAA, and thus I did not think of it. Strela is good.
2S25M is. Subpar mobility because of awful transmission, awful gun handling, paper armor, no depression, terrible reload, etc.
BMD is fine.
However, last I checked, these are not 10.3.
Genuinely don’t know what to say to any of this. Like, you’re wrong on all counts barring the Strela. The 2S25M has enough mobility to get to good spots and begin farming with its great gun. Bad reload? Just go behind cover if you don’t one shot? The 2M is bad? It can frontally engage every MBT in the game, which is unique for IFVs. The 2S38 owns flanks and destroys helis without giving away its position. Speed for these vehicles isn’t an issue. They reach the same spots you would in an MBT before the first exchanges are made.
However, last I checked, these are not 10.3.
My point was that these show up in 10.3 lineups frequently and are more than capable at even top tier.
Stuff like 2A4 or M1 will get to spots faster, can use more spots due to better gun depression, and knock out more targets in quick succession with their better reloads. And this is not factoring in how 2S25M performs poorly when turning due to its rather awful transmission, it has Type 10 syndrome but a bit better.
In a frontal engagement it loses every time, as 120mm APFSDS will kill the 2M before it can really do much. Plus, the 2M’s Kornet launchers are unstabilized, and the ATGMs will often go directly into the ground.
“owns flanks” it is down 6-7 hp/t vs MBTs. It is good against IFVs and CAS/Drones, but it stops there.
No. There are plenty of situations where this isn’t true.
If a 2S38 or BMD are getting a good amount of kills at top tier, I think we might need to check the iq of the enemy team.