You do realize that this grove, the turret ring sits higher than it? I’ve been around enough abrams to know this before hand, but now I have used your own provided evidence. It probably sits roughly 0.5 of an inch out of that grove if not taller.
Well what I’m getting at, is anything but T-90m in game doesn’t have modeled armor around the auto loader. Even then, their is an inch or two around the auto loader of spaced, thus even if warped metal was twisted to “jam” it, the force it could probably move would still be enough to by pass that.
1 Like
When i play soviet tanks, i miss the reverse gears of the US tanks, when i play US tanks i miss the survivability of the soviet tanks.
imagine if US and Soviets combined forces to make a tank… that thing would be OP as hell lol.
“Over a year ago.” Yet we have people get mad that we are concerned about changes.
I don’t have a problem with the autoloader being slowed down. Once repaired, back to normal speed
1 Like
Well I think if they just buff the health up to a decent level, it may be better.
It’s hard to implement that kind of realism, of certain shots not absolutely destroying the auto loader if they miss pretty much everything.
Currently, even if a round goes through and hits nothing, it almost always fully disables the loader.
but a health buff may somewhat offset it.
irl the tanks are penned ufp cus ammo russians wont add… already loooooosing a war and wont add the thing that beat their tanks 15 years ago lel
I don’t see an issue with them not adding rounds that would make Russian tanks vastly inferior and just unfair to play.
Why should that be added?
3 Likes
Please write in sensible english before claiming that.
3 Likes
Oh Yeah that unfair to Russia
But Russia lol pen Challenger 2 hull(or any tank’s hull) it’s fair right?
1 Like
Which is bad.
That isn’t unique to Russia. It’s also bad.
Do you want the BVM or T-90M to go down in BR when their armour is suddenly made irrelevant?
1 Like
Anddddd?
Why? You know that Challenger 2 and Leclerc armor also irrelevant yet still the same BR (even now)
Armor isn’t the only balancing factor of a tank.
The Challenger 2 is also 2 BR steps lower than the T-80BVM or Leclerc.
1 Like
Bruh
People keep saying that all the times
And what happen when Leopard got frontal armor? It suddenly became most overpowered tanks that surpassed anything in the game and make Russian’s life miserable
Challenger 2E (sorry i forget to mention E in Challenger2) still same BR as BVM despite being one of the worse MBT in the games
Funnily enough a lot of those round have to be fired a couple time to UFP those tanks. But, hey what would I know, I’ve only seen plenty of footage.
The also won’t add a T-14 Armata at 12.0, because it wouldn’t be fun for anyone opposing it.
(Keep in mind its debut was the same day the T-90M was shown off at the victory parade in 2015, which, means the T-14 Armata is 5-7 years ahead of NATO counterparts which seem to be copy catting now).
1 Like
Ignoring how the T-14 still isnt fully operabley while in the meantime western countries already showed of counterparts that would fully work and could easily be produced kek
Every tank that gets compared to the STRV-122 and 2A7 do not come off favorably. I don’t think russian tanks are bad they are just sub optimal for some situations, which is totally fine. I would like to see the T-14 in game would be a nice change of pace for russia to get a tank like that just depends on what features they decide to model on it.
That’s because it solved most issues earlier Leopards had, making them the best tanks overall.
Bad hull armor ? Not anymore.
Bad thermals ? Not anymore.
No spall liners ? Not anymore.
That’s like Russia gets a tank with good gun depression, reverse speed and ammo in the turret. Of course it would be really strong, as that would negate most cons they had.
2 Likes
Yeah annnnnd?
Aim weak spot still kill them all the same
Yeah just like Russian tanks.