Most of them who says otherwise can’t perform in any of the USSR vehicles they claims it is better, this tells you something about them lol
Let’s also not forget that Russia has 8+ top tier capable MBTs, while Germany and Sweden, the main competitors, have 4 and 5 respectively.
Add to that the most broken lineups the game has to offer and this thread turns into pure comedy.
Almost doubling your average 0.8 kd on the Russian MBTs with the one German near-top-tier tank you have is not hard with a little bit of focus.
Bro your KDR barely broke 1.0 and is overall negative, that is achievable by holding W like a headless chicken, the last thing you want to do is calling other player incompetent lmao
Well…Masterbaishin’s average kd is 0.7…his Russian MBTs are above average for him with 0.8-1.0.
Now it looks like a food chain already
As always, the stronger ussr becomes, the more tears i will see on forum that “ussr is weaker than anything else”
But none of these guys who claims USSR is strong can perform in any of the USSR vehicles they play, they either have worse KDR in their USSR vehicles than their NATO’s or they are the same across all the vehicles they played, I mean how irony. Then you will hear BS like “oh I don’t even play sirius when I play USSR haha on top of that my wife and step mother also play them that’s why the KDR is shit…”
You are partly right
USSR is not only about 1 vehicle, but about the whole setup. Top tier USSR is way more stronger than USA for example, in each category(except for cas, but even there kh-29 is the best missile).
And usually its a manner of time. When you play a lot on Germany for example, you need time to get used to USSR. I start playing too carefully which leads to worse outcome and results.
But still, ussr vehicles forgive too much mistakes. (Some time i will see real tests of relikt which is not working irl)
Ok but that’s because I got better it’s a learning curve , now look at my kd with something I got recently like Leo
USA is litterly faster , better gun , better shell , better reload rate , better reverse idk what you are talking about they have 5 Abram’s from 11.7 to 11.3 if you buy like 2 premiums + adats
They do but for lower brs , without premiums they have 4 mbts you can play in top tier and even then 1 of them doesn’t have gen 2 thermals
Aww, you cropped the original text of that cartoon. :(
Isn’t it ironic though that a player complains about the vehicles he is doing best in to be underperforming?
One doesn’t have gen 2 thermals? :D
For Germany only one of them does have gen 2 thermals, unless you want to do all your aiming from the commander view.
But it has 4 11.7 veichles
It can pen t80bvm hull in any point? No? So whats the point of that “better shell”?
Yes ? It can pen a t-80u throught hull and pen it near drivers hatch and lower front plate and can pen on throught era if it ain’t angled
Are you blind?
Which shouldn’t all be at the same BR.
We have:
Leopard 2A5
Leopard 2A6 (a firepower upgrade to the A5, should be 0.3 above it)
Leopard 2 PSO (a protection upgrade to the A5, which also should be 0.3 higher)
The 2A7V (an upgrade in firepower and protection, finally with gen 2 gunner thermals and the only true top tier vehicle)
By “it” I meant bvm