I agree the bvm is much better then t-90m but it still has more weaknesses then other tanks of nsto , especially since you get matched against Germany / Sweden about every game , which are hard to pen on large distances for Russia and hard to brawl with . I agree the bvm is a good mbt and better then Merkava, ariete, chally, Leclerc (some times ) and type 90 in some occasions , but it’s still much worse then leos or strvs against who you match up against
1 Like
Slower than Japan wut
It’s like crying a tiger is slower than an M18
The Japanese tanks are very light so they can Traverse japanese terrain and probably fit on the Japanese narrow gauge Railway
So if they only have extremely Light armor combined with a decent engine ofcource they will be fast
2 Likes
Left side lower frontal plate is pretty much your only option frontally, aside from the breech. Drivers vision port is also an option but there’s a good chance your round will bounce, it isn’t reliable.
1 Like
Bvm litterly weighs less then the type 90, and while it has better armour it doesn’t have better armour then chally or 2a7 your comparing it rather , it has average armour at best with any penetration blowing you up since it takes out either 2 crew members or the auto loader , the survivability on the bvm is litterly comparable to leclerc
The challenger has a pretty large Bottom plate Which can be penned by WW2 guns
1 Like
And so can the bottom plate of a bvm were it not angled ?
Have you ever seen one from the side or an Angle
Pretty much all Russian top tier tanks have era Which can defeat apfsds with another layer of more apfsds defeating era on top of that
There is litterly no era where the weakspots are , relying or era may tank 1 shot but after that it’s gg , chally got strong composite on upper from plate and turret cheeks with less weak spots then bvm
Which it’s compensates with its extemly bad Mobility
And its Bottom plate weakspot which is much larger and at a pretty shallow Angle compered to Russian tanks
But it doesn’t have a weak spot near drivers hatch and not as big as the weak spot near the gun , I’m not arguing that the bvm is worse then chally , but the fact that comparing it to a much more armoured tank is inaccurate , compare it to the Abram’s which is faster , better shell , faster reload , worse armour but by a little bit , 40 km reverse speed
This is a major cope thread lmfao
8 Likes
He isn’t really wrong, Russian MBTs are worse than most competitors.
2 Likes
Maybe you just suck
1 Like
I mean russia still uses glorified T64s so they are going to be crap (if they did modern MBTS right) however they have strong armour and a gun to hold its own just as well as the Leo and Abrams much more than a CR2 or ariete
1 Like
are you for real? the challenger 2 driver hatch weak spot is huge compared to the weak spot on a t90 or t80
6 Likes
Use it well soldier
This is the first I’ve seen of this problem if I’m being honest. I mean, there’s a shit ton of Abrams are bad posts (I can see their argument clear) going all the way back to 2020 and pages after pages with a quick Google search but I’m surprised to see anyone taking issues with Russian tanks. You
4 Likes
The USA, France, Italy, and Israel must not exist then lol.
They’ve got the smallest weakspots outside of the 2A7s.
5 Likes
Thanks Shipmaster !