Since they made separate Brs for ground and air, i think and im pretty sure there is a lot of bombers that could get a lower Br, BVVD said " i know the bombers are really fragile " but we dont know if he is plaining to increase the armor or not, it must be, but personally i think they can decrease the Br instead, and make place for future Bombers such as the B-1B, B-2A, B-52, Avro Vulcan, and so on.
My suggestion here is to decrease of the next bombers:
B-17E/L 5.0Br → 4.7Br
( they put it a .3Br higher than the B-17E because it gets an extra gun of 7.62mm, wich is nuts )
PB4Y 4.7Br → 4.3Br
B-17G 5.0Br → 4.7Br
B-24D 5.7Br → 4.7Br ( no reason to play an almost 1.0Br higher bomber that perform worse than the B-17G in every aspect )
B-29A-BN 7.0Br → 6.3Br ( at that Br bracket even at 6.3Br will be a free kill for everyone who know how to doged turrets )
Tu-4 8.0Br → 7.3Br ( tbh is the only bomber i have a positive K/D ratio, but the fact that you can get killed with missiles and pay that sick repair cost… )
B-57 Canberra ( gunned ) 8.3Br → 8.0Br and the gunless 8.3Br → 7.7Br for the american and 8.0Br → 7.3Br for the british since it have less payloas
Vautour 9.0Br → 8.3Br
B-66 9.0Br → 8.7Br
So now moving down those bombers we can actually make room for things like Tu-95, Tu-22, Tu-160, Avro Vulcan, B-1B, B-2B, B-52 and B-21
At the next Brs:
Tu-95 8.7Br
Tu-22 9.3Br
Tu-160 9.7Br
B-1B 9.3Br
B-2A 9.0Br
B-52 8.7Br
Avro Vulcan 8.3Br
B-21A 9.0Br
btw is not like moving down to those brs would brake the game, it would just make bombers a bit more playables, but they will still fre e kills overall