in a game where milliseconds matter, yeah its valid.
Having meltdowns on this level ? Not really.
Doesn’t matter. Its still feedback, which Gaijin doesn’t care about.
1 Like
Lmaoooooo not only do you ignore the carousel(profoundly stupid) you also ignore the arm needing to fully lower for the gun to able able to fire.
You’re just plain wrong, gajin models it as the ammo always being side to side, it doesn’t magically spawn a shell into the arm like your goofy arguments imply they should, the carousel is part of the autoloader yet for some reason you think it intellectually honest to completely ignore it’s existence even in the most optimal conditions of two side by side shells.
Also love how you talk about misinformation yet your entire argument revolves around ignoring the existance of the carousel.
2 Likes
It doesn’t count what ammo is where. Duh
Lmao
You:
If you had made one in the first place
They threw that out with the M-18, that’s when they had to hit American tanks.
M-18 is plenty good at 6.0
Just want to point out that in each of these translations, it says they should be “less than six seconds”. Not surr if you are trying to counter the argument that the LeClerc should not get a 5 second reload.
3 Likes
Problem with this change is Gaijin has taken absolute ideal training ground scenarios.
yet for NATO tanks and even other nations autoloaders do not have the same criteria applied to them. We have M1 loaders stating 3.4-4 seconds for the best loaders, Leclerc autoloader should be 3.5 seconds.
Now we have Russian tanks stock have a faster = reload to some NATO aced crews which costs million of SL and game time or GE. That cannot be right.
3 Likes
So, if the T-72 says that reloading takes less than 8 seconds, can the developer set it to 4?
The game displays the stated figure. Here it is 6.
If the time were 5 seconds, the documents would say 5.
The best I’ve seen is “slightly less than 6.” Obviously, this means 5.9 or thereabouts, although it is unclear under what conditions this figure applies.
The GIAT brochure says 6, and there’s no point in arguing with that.
Can’t be right until you realize reload isn’t the only metric tanks have.
The feedback: Gaijin pls revert the buff because I’m extremely salty every time a certain nation gets even a miniscule buff
1 Like
Generally the reload rate is a balancing tool, but I would say the T-80s don’t really need the reduction as they are still very good tanks.
Like I stated one of the bug reports sources is the same and states it can be less than 6 seconds, if he’d actually looked.
“the GIAT brochure” which is a printed A4 piece of paper with literally no proof at all it is what you claim it to be.
Go to the leclerc thread in which I tagged you in.
In what world is it 3.5 seconds?
EDIT Take this to the leclerc buff thread
Ok 4 seconds
1 Like
Oh no, they received 0.1s reload buff, such a tragedy.
1 Like