You say it yourself,
If VT doesnt need to move. But if it dont move you just load an empty slot from carousel - yea happy
“Technical rate of Fire”
You say it yourself,
If VT doesnt need to move. But if it dont move you just load an empty slot from carousel - yea happy
“Technical rate of Fire”
№1 - T-62
№2 and 3 - T-64A

this table from original doc

Yes which states standard rate it doesn’t inlcude combat fire rate in the brochure.
AS well as this I cannot find this brochure anywhere online and what you have here has no official documentation to say it’s from GIAT otherthan your own word lol.
I could create that exact same documnet and change it to 6 to 5 easily.
ANYWAY , as this is about T64 - T80 etc I shant continue the talk of leclerc. we can continue that ona leclerc page
.
That table is the one thing that differs from standard T-64 manuals, but is it a good source? Not really — it’s nowhere near as solid as technical manuals.
It’s a study, and the table doesn’t define the initial conditions: carousel index, whether the gun is empty, whether it’s already at the loading position.
So to me it’s only a secondary source. Believe what you want — I’ve shown enough evidence. I’m done here. If Gaijin claimed 3BM60 is made of adamantium and cited Marvel as the source, you’d probably accept that as well.
Have fun
Manual cyclogram show 6 secs for not-ATGM
I can still point out plenty of spots that you think were “removed” which they weren’t, in which you can be a hull down monster. Play the tank correctly.
And I am all for historical accuracy. But also correct brs for vehicles.
Given the mobility of the Stryker alone it should be apparent that it would be too good for 10.3
The T58 is still magical that it hasn’t been nerfed into the ground yet.
But no, everyone rages when myself and others have been asking for years for the Russian auto loaders to be corrected.
I’d love to see which nation everyone would always be mad at if Russia simply was never in the game. Would it be Germany? France? Or Japan?
How should the T58 be nerfed? Also, it’s been around for several months now, if it was going to be nerfed, I feel like it would have happened by now (maybe I’m wrong though).
probably china xD
The question for me is whether this change is real. If it is, then no problem. Now the devs need to do their damn job on all the other extremely important reports, and do it damn fast. They’re quick enough to release premium tanks and garbage. For example, we’ve had the AMX-30B2 Brenus for years without its 100mm of KE protection—100 damn millimeters! Or the 100mm mantlet on the Centurion MkX—another damn 100mm! Or the mantlet on the M1 Abrams…
PD: Devs, fix the damn HEAT too, it’s pathetic with the number of shots that don’t do any damage.
Nah, we China mains would simply fall into oblivion if Russia’s removed. The vulnerabilities of Chinese tanks are much larger compared to the others, and the pass rate of issue reports regarding incorrectness in modeling Chinese vehicles is really low, so we have the HQ-11 and J-10C released in this update, neither of which is up to the top BR where they actually sit. The buff to the Chinese tanks’ autoloading time is just a sidegrade of what Russia is getting, as it wouldn’t be plausible if RUS got the buff but CHN doesn’t. But if possible I suspect that some devs are more than happy to change the loading time of Russian tanks only, but not Chinese ones.
Have you COMPLETELY disregarded the affirmation regarding the newly added M10 Booker? Why would you not like the Stryker to receive the historically accurate reload, getting upped in BR, if you so said you can be a hull down monster? It can survive 10.7/11.0/11.3; but i would also very much prefer the other light tanks which are so called monsters to be moved up too.
and you call me a troll
„Yes we have double standards. That our nation is largely exempt is a coincidence“
Coughing leclerc fan vs hydrogen documents
It’ll likely go up in BR next changes come around due to how well it’s doing.
100 percent germany TBH.
they’re IMO one of if not the most handheld
The roudn which changed armoured doctrine globally, in game? useless
yeah but russian tanks have worse repairs, worse survivability due to less crew as well.
the auto loader getting damaged is a ballache.
You realise the bug report I linked disproves his statement no?
theres about 10 sources in it, some of which are directly from the same book he used lol
All this fuss over a 0.1s buff.