no they dont lmao.
Centurions should be firing 20pdr shells every 4 seconds, chieftains about every 5.
the type 90 should be about every 3.5 seconds as well
4 Likes
Reduce the reload time of Leopard 2s!!!
1 Like
Probably gotta do with the chassis… or so they thought, as autoloader doesn’t have anything to do with chassis types.
But then again, 1001 is a testbed vehicle, so it might be plausible for it to use an older AZ.
1 Like
Leopard 2A4/5/6/PL/PSO/2A4M: Am I a joke?
1 Like
dayum imagine the type90 shoots every 3.5 secs
And how does this contradict anything?
How is there unbalance in T-72/90s getting a 0.1 second buff (still the slowest reloads in Top Tier), and ZTZ/T-80s getting a reload barely closer to Leopard 2’s at 6-6.7, when everyone else has 5 second reloads and even 4 second ones?
9 Likes
Im trying to not play 5.7 anymore bcs YAK9 "BUFF" with the 45mm "light" cannons (the plane cant turn with those irl). I avoid toptier with all my soul, bcs air force, now I will stop playing 9.7-10.7 bcs Terminators and these “historical secret documents”. BTW, nice new buff to those terminators today. Nice job.
1 Like
Well, giving an increase in rate of fire to every Leopard except the 122s and 2A7s would be nonsensical.
As nonsensical as CR3TD having a slower reload than all the rest of the CR2s…
4 Likes
Sure sure, whatever. Time to fully migrate over to US 10.7/russian 10.3.
1 Like
so what about the leopards and abrams? these manned reload vehicle should have a shorter reload speed,now u cant reload faster than T-80 if ur L2 isnt ace
1 Like
2a7v’s and strv 122’s maybe but 2a4’s? a5? a6? are they really that better than their counterpart?
1 Like
And the truth is that they should already include something from Germany’s Leopards because we are falling behind, which is why I always say the Leopard 2-140mm would be very useful.
Moving western/japanese autoloaders out of the equation*:
When aced, investing nearly a million to ace it. There’s many people who don’t want to (or simply can’t) invest such resources on a single vehicle, let alone an entire lineup.
That is unfair.
4 Likes
If you compare the VT-4/4A1 to even the non-uparmored Leo 2s the Leo 2s will still come out on top in almost all categories lol, even with the current reload buff.
4 Likes
Im trying to not play 5.7 anymore bcs YAK9 "BUFF" with those 45mm "ligth" cannons (the plane cant turn with those irl). I avoid toptier with all my soul bcs air force, now I will stop playing 9.7-10.7 bcs Terminator and these “historical secret documents”. BTW, nice new buff to those terminators today. Nice job.
1 Like
As I said;
giving an increase in rate of fire to every Leopard except the 122s and 2A7s would be nonsensical.
It would only be opening Pandora’s box and end up slippery-sloping its way into giving the 122s and 2A7s a reload buff too.
1 Like
So the whole Leo 2 family should suffer from having arbitrarirly slower reload than everybody else, while not even being “the best” (you’re kidding if you think 2PL or 2A5 or 2A4M can compete for that title) just cus there’s a total of 5 Leopard 2s that “don’t need it”?
6 Likes
because reload isnt the ONLY factor in how a vehicle performs… you should know that better than anyone but I guess ignoring the turret basket on Abrams and Leopards isnt on your “balance” card when a single shot now completely renders a 2nd a shot impossible unless they shift the hull or there engine/breach is not disabled
5 Likes
And M1A2s come out on top too, nerf them to 6s when? Or Leclercs? )))
1 Like