If you compare the VT-4/4A1 to even the non-uparmored Leo 2s the Leo 2s will still come out on top in almost all categories lol, even with the current reload buff.
4 Likes
Im trying to not play 5.7 anymore bcs YAK9 "BUFF" with those 45mm "ligth" cannons (the plane cant turn with those irl). I avoid toptier with all my soul bcs air force, now I will stop playing 9.7-10.7 bcs Terminator and these “historical secret documents”. BTW, nice new buff to those terminators today. Nice job.
1 Like
As I said;
giving an increase in rate of fire to every Leopard except the 122s and 2A7s would be nonsensical.
It would only be opening Pandora’s box and end up slippery-sloping its way into giving the 122s and 2A7s a reload buff too.
1 Like
So the whole Leo 2 family should suffer from having arbitrarirly slower reload than everybody else, while not even being “the best” (you’re kidding if you think 2PL or 2A5 or 2A4M can compete for that title) just cus there’s a total of 5 Leopard 2s that “don’t need it”?
5 Likes
because reload isnt the ONLY factor in how a vehicle performs… you should know that better than anyone but I guess ignoring the turret basket on Abrams and Leopards isnt on your “balance” card when a single shot now completely renders a 2nd a shot impossible unless they shift the hull or there engine/breach is not disabled
2 Likes
And M1A2s come out on top too, nerf them to 6s when? Or Leclercs? )))
1 Like
do u know that Type-90 and Type-10’s reload speed should be about 3s/r?
Hahahaha very balanced, “reload rate is factor of balance in game” unless its russian bias poo, then ofc we gonna get a magic sekrit dokumints, but armor in nato tanks like challenger 3, leclercs etc? naaaaah :D :D :D :D
4 Likes
so it’s better to let 2a4’s, a5, and a6 suffer than being nonsensical?
1 Like
Btw they need a better Leos to no only make more russians tanks all this years is full of russians tanks.
WHEN IN GAME???/ (pls??)
1 Like
hopefully never
1 Like
Nope, because that is why they are buffing the VT-4s.
The gap between the non-uparmored Leo 2s and M1A2 is a lot smaller than the gap between the VT-4 and Leo 2s.
If you think they are seriously suffering currently than I don’t even know what to say.
Holy shit my forum is dying.
6 Likes
why??
The one time Gajins bug reporting team puts in an ounce of effort, and it’s a buff to the tank arguably least in need of a buff in WT.
2 Likes
Yes, and that’s because I play each and every single MBT of each and every single nation (except Italy lol).
So all of these petty “bias wars” are beneath me. I don’t care about “Russian bias”, I don’t care about “Germany/Russia/Whatever suffers”, I don’t care about “I want my nation to be the best” because I am no “nation’s main”.
I look at every tank and its capabilities in every aspect and as a whole with the same eyes, and I only want true balance and realism across all of them. I don’t have any biases towards nor against any tank, I only want the best for all of them within realism and balance.
So no, I do not intend to pretend that buffing T-90M’s rate of fire by 0.1 seconds, or the Chinese ones by 0.5, is going to “break the game” nor that it’s a display of “unbalanced bias”. And no, I do not intend to pretend that the Leopard 2s need to have the fastest rate of fire like the Challengers or the Arietes either when they are superior in every other possible metric.
7 Likes
T-64A was already mid at 9.3, all the usual USSR MBT debufs + no LRF and lacking armor since most 9.3s can pen its UFP already
1 Like
they(except 2a7v’s and strv 122’s) are suffering compared to other nato 120mm tank at the same br
Juega italia mano