Ok main
Judging by pictures their mz should have 6s as well. On AP, HEAT and HE. Except that У ammunition but I have no clue what does that mean. Maybe training one (Учебный) but unsure.
“Управляемый” the 9M119 ATGM and such.
lmao, he isnt wrong in except the armor thing which can be debated with USSR tanks having a better frontal armor layout with smaller weakspots. in everything else hes right with mobility and reload rate.
Ah true I forgot about agtms completely

guys the 3BM60 alone on the T80BVM alone has a unique reload time of 6,4 instead of 6,0 as every other one (T80U’s 3BM46 doesn’t have it) is it a bug perhaps?
I did notify them. It defo is a bug.(basically wrong calculation since its based of 1/0.15 something something) whatever that led it to be 6.4s instead of 6.0
That was the code that was put into for all 3bm60s or whateve
only the T80BVM has this problem, 90m, b3a and b3m does not indeed their 3BM60 is fine, i hope it’s as you say that is a bug…
Unfortunately it’s the one that’s entirely made up as it’s not physically possible to reach that speed for it
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/1t1qJuRT5Z9B
T-80B and T-64B reload speed → accepted
btw, when this will be approved? Community Bug Reporting System
or will there be double standards here?
Only one question. Why did Chinese MBTs receive such a weak buff? According to all indicators, these are the worst MBTs in the game. They don’t have any good characteristics. And according to all indicators, they are either average or below average. As a result, even on websites for reading statistics, their KD rates are on par with tanks of other nations, which are used for 2-3 respawn. Why are they getting a ridiculous buff to 6.7/7.0 seconds of reload? They should be given at least 6.5, and preferably 6.0, like Soviet tanks. Because even so, they will still be worse.
Check my reply above, i alr asked the forum manager exactly about this.
To be fair, the M1 and Leo 2A4 are generally both listed by good players as the shared best MBT at 10.7.
So I don’t think either is really worse than the other, more like sidegrades.
Your question is wrong, becose your forget. Like all another in this theme.
Reloading its balanching characteristics. For buff or nerfed they dont need notning. If need they can made BVM 1 sec Reload.
I used to hold the same opinion, but nowadays M1 just does more for me. Most importantly, it doesnt have that stupid safety limitation for gun depression over the back. And being able to outreload most oponents also help.
Gaijin when you report a vehicle not having realistic reload: RoF is a Balance factor!
Gaijin when they buff Soviet vehicles:
Here‘s all the research we went through to show it should actually be like this!
Gaijin when some western weapon system is too good: We decided to implement the way we think it should be.
😂
true !
since when did the leopards suffer in this game? Did i miss a update or something because for me they always been the most dominant tanks in this game for years and still are




