Revising the Rate of Fire of the T-64, T-80, Т-72, ZTZ96, ZTZ99 Series and VT4, VT4A1 Tanks

Ok main

2 Likes

Judging by pictures their mz should have 6s as well. On AP, HEAT and HE. Except that У ammunition but I have no clue what does that mean. Maybe training one (Учебный) but unsure.

Управляемый” the 9M119 ATGM and such.

lmao, he isnt wrong in except the armor thing which can be debated with USSR tanks having a better frontal armor layout with smaller weakspots. in everything else hes right with mobility and reload rate.

Ah true I forgot about agtms completely

1 Like

War Thunder Screenshot 2025.12.25 - 18.21.46.64 - Copia
guys the 3BM60 alone on the T80BVM alone has a unique reload time of 6,4 instead of 6,0 as every other one (T80U’s 3BM46 doesn’t have it) is it a bug perhaps?

@Stona_WT

2 Likes

I did notify them. It defo is a bug.(basically wrong calculation since its based of 1/0.15 something something) whatever that led it to be 6.4s instead of 6.0

That was the code that was put into for all 3bm60s or whateve

1 Like

only the T80BVM has this problem, 90m, b3a and b3m does not indeed their 3BM60 is fine, i hope it’s as you say that is a bug…

Unfortunately it’s the one that’s entirely made up as it’s not physically possible to reach that speed for it

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/1t1qJuRT5Z9B
T-80B and T-64B reload speed → accepted

2 Likes

btw, when this will be approved? Community Bug Reporting System

or will there be double standards here?

1 Like

Only one question. Why did Chinese MBTs receive such a weak buff? According to all indicators, these are the worst MBTs in the game. They don’t have any good characteristics. And according to all indicators, they are either average or below average. As a result, even on websites for reading statistics, their KD rates are on par with tanks of other nations, which are used for 2-3 respawn. Why are they getting a ridiculous buff to 6.7/7.0 seconds of reload? They should be given at least 6.5, and preferably 6.0, like Soviet tanks. Because even so, they will still be worse.

1 Like
I did, even knowing its respective handicap :)




image
And I know I’m not the sharpest ground player in the playerpool, but it sucks knowing my vehicles could be a fraction better if I invest another million into all of them.

Check my reply above, i alr asked the forum manager exactly about this.

To be fair, the M1 and Leo 2A4 are generally both listed by good players as the shared best MBT at 10.7.

So I don’t think either is really worse than the other, more like sidegrades.

2 Likes

Your question is wrong, becose your forget. Like all another in this theme.

Reloading its balanching characteristics. For buff or nerfed they dont need notning. If need they can made BVM 1 sec Reload.

I used to hold the same opinion, but nowadays M1 just does more for me. Most importantly, it doesnt have that stupid safety limitation for gun depression over the back. And being able to outreload most oponents also help.

1 Like

Gaijin when you report a vehicle not having realistic reload: RoF is a Balance factor!

Gaijin when they buff Soviet vehicles:
Here‘s all the research we went through to show it should actually be like this!

Gaijin when some western weapon system is too good: We decided to implement the way we think it should be.

😂

7 Likes

true !

since when did the leopards suffer in this game? Did i miss a update or something because for me they always been the most dominant tanks in this game for years and still are