Look another photshop !
On Nato tanks you have armor holes , while on russian it gets only stronger in some places .
Yeah, and if I go to the non-ERA portions of T-90M’s hull there’s less there as well.
About the same amount of weakspot as Strv 122 against OFL 120 F1/3BM60/m/95 as Strv 122.
Just a slightly tighter cannon breech area over T-90A.
That’s why you always AIM for idler wheels & destroy the tank.
CQC makes Russian tanks worse for a reason.
Oh, you even make this silly statement.
Sure I go for the wheels !
If you still dont see how BIASED this tank is , with imaginary armor . Well I guess I`ll stop wasting my time.
just 680mm vs 123mm on STRV for same shot.
1 Like
Also I see what you did now. Both aren’t good faith to portray as average armor cause people hitting weird cherry picked pixel spots isn’t cool.
You wont find any of 680 of protection on STRV front wheels no matter what angle you will take . It happens only on russian tanks.
You won’t find it on Russian tanks either because there’s no armor on the wheel.
You have to aim slightly back to avoid the FRONT armor of that tank, and that’s it.
All you’ve done today is prove there’s no Russian bias.
I get it, you want to defend the mythical Russian bias but it just doesn’t exist.
No nation bias exists.
I’ve refuted people claiming these fictions for years.
American bias posters are among my favorite tho.
Where is DM73 on Leo2A7 then ?
I think I have severe brain damage after reading all of that.
3 Likes
This is why modern vehicles should of never happened imho
I can somewhat agree. Most of my fun has been in the cold war.
1 Like
The same place Vacuum 1 is.
There’s no reason to add rounds to lol-pen at-BR tanks when they can’t lol-pen you either.
Honestly, DM43 should’ve been Germany’s top round & 3BM46 Soviets.
But we got what we got.
@Avierno
Americans aren’t provoking you, calm down.
Not a bug is not the problem.
Acknowledged is a problem. What does it mean?
Literally it could be “Damn that’s crazy bro” instead of acknowledged, or even better “Too long, didn’t read”
1 Like
What ?
Ahhhh I understand your logic , russian tanks can lol pen NATO tanks (Ariette for example) but when 1 NATO tank would lol pen russian tanks it should not be implemented.
Nice logic bro really.
Now you’re claiming Abrams, Leopard 2, etc are Russian tanks again…
Vacuum can only be added to T-14 and I’m not supporting its introduction.
T-90M cannot get a lolpen round, what they have currently is the best round they ever made for that gun, and it’s not even lolpen, cause it’s M322 equivalent. A round exclusively top on Merkava Mk3s.
try that again with the same angle. 49* vs 57* does a lot of difference.
@AlvisWisla
Same angle, same ammo, same distance.
with protection map to show where pen is possible:
and this is WITHOUT the extra ERA for the T-90M
4 Likes
Is… English not your first language?