I don’t know what you think is special about the KF41 that’s any different than the generic conversations we’ve been having
He is an example.
is a wrong existence
Also ARIETE
In what direction, and how did you determine that it was wrong?
Wrong BR, he is the representative of the highest BR in the game, but does he really perform as he should?
gaijin puts him at 10.7 through the intensity of fantasy in his mind
You didn’t answer either question…
In what direction (as in, over or under powered?), and how did you determine that it was wrong?
Um… your math is off.
If a vehicle performs worse it goes down in BR IF it’s reasonable to do so. Disputing your 2nd bullet point.
Both of them were wrong, I just mixed the two up in my head, you’re right. Edited.
-
OP = too low in BR. Skilled players flock to it (unskilled players stay) → performs better because of skilled players → goes up in BR, canceling out OP-ness
-
UP = too high in BR. Skilled players flee it (unskilled players stay) → performs worse due to skilled players leaving → goes down in BR, canceling out UP-ness
1 Like
Simple horizontal comparison, does this require any statistics on data?
You STILL didn’t answer either question… (How do you perform a “simple horizontal comparison” exactly?) Let me know if/when you actually want to keep discussing by just answering the questions. Otherwise, have a good one
Is this supposed to be a joke?
“There is no bias”.
A damn propaganda video is approved as a source for one nation, when western ones are like the situation with stingers etc…
10 Likes
Or you can explain it
KF41 Two members in it easily destroyed turret, wrong and fragile armor, poor performance missiles at 10.7 ADS in 10.7 cannot intercept missiles of any vehicle of the same level
BMP2M has the same fragile turret, which is fragile but better armored than KF41. It fires high-penetrating armor-piercing shells in four bursts while moving. The cannon is also better than the KF41 10.0
I don’t want to debate with you using meaningless words like prejudice and discrimination.
-
How exactly do you calculate “the cannon being better” and by how much? This sounds like you vaguely squinted at the stat cards and subjectively made up an answer, not like you have a controlled, objective, repeatable method.
-
How much are you weighting the importance of “the cannon being better”? Is that 40% of your consideration? 10%? Can I see the whole rubric you used with all the weightings?
-
Why did you not mention anything about size, mobility, sensors, secondary weapons, traverse, reverse speeds, etc? You also left out skill of the players playing it, whether it does well or not in the maps that are common currently, how cramped the crews are of things it faces (which affects how effective AP rounds are vs filler), how well it works with the team’s other vehicles at that BR…
If only there were some extremely simple method that takes ALL of that PERFECTLY into account in the EXACT ratios that all of those things actually matter in game, with almost zero effort. Like, I dunno, win rates?
Do you think ARIETE’s gaming experience and actual strength are better than vehicles like BVM?
You are an unreasonable person, and no matter how reasonable you seem to be, you have actually distorted it into something ridiculous.
Can’t even do horizontal comparison?
I have no idea, because just like you, I don’t have an incredibly complex model for how to account for all the 400 different variables that would affect both. And unlike you, I’m not willing to just make a subjective eye squinting guess. I would just measure win rate, like Gaijin does, to find the answer, but those aren’t publicly posted.
Since both of those are non-premium vehicles, and Gaijin has therefore zero monetary incentive to lie about the win rates, though, in this case I trust they measured them accurately. (I’m not sure I do so much trust it for premiums…)
Can’t even do horizontal comparison?
Nobody can. the game is a hundred times more complex than it would have to be for that to be possible objectively
If you think so, then you have won. You have achieved your own spiritual victory.
Game operators themselves have to devote energy to games and maintain the game environment.
对此 我只能说 菜就多练
1 Like
It’s not a matter of opinion. If you DID have an objective, repeatable method for these “horizontal comparisons”, then you would have been able to very easily answer all my detailed questions about your measurement methods and how much you weighted each variable, and also my questions about the variables you left out, etc.
You were unable to answer any of that. Obviously because you don’t have an objective method at all for horizontal comparisons. (Nobody does. Nobody can EVER answer those questions.)
You are so unobjective and you still have the nerve to criticize me.
You said I couldn’t answer any questions. I already gave the answers.
Let official personnel actually play instead of using big data
It’s ridiculous that you think the technology of a few people represents the strength of a vehicle is reasonable.
Edit: nevermind, this is just starting to go in circles. Have a good one.
LOL Good night, my baby. After all, we are in different worlds.