There’s a universal rule that if you suppress someone he’ll become more extreme in his opinion. Gaijin has suppressed people for a very long time and extensively. At no point has Gaijin ever replied to players’ true concerns, never addressed problems. That’s why there was the summer review bombing. People were fed up. If you feed this behaviour, eventually some people will start taking extreme measures, including doxxing people who deserve to be fired, not personally attacked and threatened.
There are many things in life where one’s responsibility is measured without the interference of a court. For example fatherhood. None will imprison or fine you for being a bad father. But you’re required to take care of your child nonetheless.
In other instances, a level of responsibility IS measured. For example car accidents. The party that is more responsible will pay a heftier compensation/fine.
But doxxing people, is just like swatting, and that is absolutely off the hook stupid…
Stop trying to validate stupidity.
that is VERY different. if you compare to car accident this is the equivalent of someone thinking you have a to loud car that annoys them and then they intentionally driving into you to harm you. your loud car will have no bearing in responsibility in that case. no actions that are not criminal deserve criminal actions as a response.
Yeah i honestly don’t care what you say.
For the love of god come up with something else…
These strawman arguments are just pathetic.
Also you pretending people calling you a troll means they are talking about “all german players” or “all swedish players” is starting to get old.
PS. Quoting people and then adding your own words there is just…weird.
6 Likes
I’m sick of people defaming me cause I’m not defending Russian equipment.
I’m really sincerely sick of the hatred.
Then maybe stop arguing like that?
There is a reason so many people don’t like you lmao…
From the way I see it, people invent delusions in their heads to spread hate.
Lmfao…
Actually insane
1 Like
@AlvisWisla
just watch this:
The BVM’s not even best round easily pens the front of the M1A2 SEP V2. even in areas the protection map say it shouldn’t.
3 Likes
It’s not even about being realistic, but rather just as viable. Like I agree with you. It’s beyond frustrating to see my long dart go into the side of a T-90 or T-80 and do nothing but I detonate if even a BMP-2 so much as coughs at me. And that’s what not even just blatant Russian-Stand will advise you to do.
“Don’t engage MBTs head on. Their armor is the thickest there. Move to a position that allows you to take side shots or at the LFP”. If doing so still doesn’t actually help you in defeating the tank, then what is the strat? I guess just rain warheads on foreheads with the F-16C? Op, can’t do that because hello Pantsir.
We can all agree that Gaijin manipulates a variety of things under the purpose of “balancing”. Which in the grand scheme of things as fine. But when there is a significantly obvious bias towards Russian vehicles, of course non-Russian main players are going to be pissed.
What really is a slap to the johnson is the fact that I’ve seen Stona and Smin mock people over “Russian bias” comments in dev blogs on their home page. And we don’t even have to go into the obvious bias of a certain bug moderator. How are we suppose to believe or even buy into their balancing policies if they don’t even respect players enough to professionally address it?
So many times I’ve found myself wishing we had better, or at least other, community managers and community engagement. I understand they’re just the middle man between us and the devs but man do I feel like we are getting shafted in terms of representation. And this isn’t from a place of “I’m mad because they don’t fix my issues with the game” but more so the communication, feedback, and genuine explanation for why X is X or why X is changing to Y just seems beyond lacking.
3 Likes
Dev server damage models aren’t final for one.
Second, he aims up at the T-series which you don’t do in matches. Your gun is just above the T-series gun due to height differences; however MATAWG has the gun aimed at the top of the driver port ERA instead, which is inaccurate as no tank has the gun mounted that low.
you are correct that the damage models are not correct for dev. but it gives an idea, a sort of general direction.
i don’t know what you are trying to say here, “aim up”?
you know tanks can stand on hills right? maps aren’t flat ground.
it might not be the most common of angles but it very much happens.
the heatmap on the T-serries is however created from a level angle.
2 Likes
Protection analysis of T-series tanks should look like this from the camera with tank camera angle into account active:
Cause even Abrams gun is mounted higher than T-90’s gun.
Not by as much as Leopard or Leclerc.
yeah, that does not help you case at all.
the area pf possible pen is so much smaller than any other tank in the game.
2 Likes
For any range beyond 50 meters, what he is doing is accurate.
What you do in your next reply is generally heavily inaccurate.
Edit: Here, for the sake of understanding.
Big image
3 Likes
Beyond 500* meters.
You underestimate how easy it is to see weakspots after a bit of practice.
No, I have tested range and the effect of tank height extensively.
When I say beyond 50 meters, I mean beyond 50 meters.
3 Likes
see them is one thing, hitting them at distance or in movement is another.
its way easier hitting big weakspots than small ones in ANY situation. it does not change anything that you know where to aim.
1 Like