More tanks don’t = advantage, look at Britain
Did the Abrams not get the second best shell, firepower, great turret armor and mobility
Do half the tanks in-game at top tier not have great turret armor, reload, and mobility? And I have honestly never noticed any significant difference between top-tier shells and their performance against each other. An Abrams round and a Leclerc/Merkava’s rounds are penetrating the same places on a BVM; its extra pen doesn’t let it do anything new or different.
Furthermore, the bigger complaint is, why do only some vehicles get this major nerf while others don’t? It should’ve been an all-or-nothing feature.
Furthermore, not many people are shooting at the turrets of tanks in top tier? Breach, yes, but the lower front plate is a more common target and a more universal target on all tanks. I’ve used the M1A1 a lot lately in uptiers, and despite having lower turret armor that top-tier rounds can penetrate, I am rarely if ever shot there.
No? Barely any tanks have a 5sec reload paired with the second best shell in game.
Russian tanks have also been nerfed. So have the Chinese tanks. Americans and NATO isn’t the only victim of nerfs.
Maybe you’re using it wrongly. Sniping with the Abrams is much better
Except Merkavas get 5s reload with a slightly worse shell. Leclercs have better mobility with 5s reload (won’t comment on their shell’s performance because it’s one of the few top-tier tanks I haven’t played yet). Britain gets a 5s reload with an ok shell. Japan 4s with a great shell. Italy 5s with what I guess you’d call the best shell. The only ones with poor reloads are T-series tanks and Leos.
Additionally, I believe this nerf should apply to everyone. The idea for this nerf was for tanks that often have lots of empty space to be more vulnerable. So, where is the Type 90/10 nerf? I never mentioned Russia or China…
???
So then type 90/10 should get nerfed too. Why cry about abrams? Then you should ask gaijin to nerf those tanks instead of crying about abrams
I never cried about Abrams specifically. I said this should have been an all-or-nothing feature. They should get this nerf. So should Leclercs, everyone should. You’re making up details and picking fights where there shouldn’t be fights. My original point was that it’s annoying how only Abrams and Leo have this as of now, and soon Russia.
2 Likes
M829A2 can penetrate K5 tanks much more reliably than Leclercs round. Round penetration also matters for spalling.
can you please tell me where i can get this invulnerable ammo carousel T tanks, i keep hearing people never played ussr/china tree keep saying such but i have yet to seen one myself
you hit an empty spot not everyone playing T tanks bring a full ammo in its carousel
Empty spot every single time…yet standard ammo storage the spall hits other charges causing detonations.
1 Like
the question still stay, does it hit an empty spot or not. because for a soviet tanks 30 open slot on the autoloader doesnt mean you have to bring exactly 30 ammo
The shells empty or not are packed together the loader should offer no protection to the remaining ammo and the loader should create additional spall and it does not.
1 Like
Bull crap. I’ve seen video footage of people hitting ammo directly, it either turns red or just disappears for no reason.
I don’t have video footage of what happened to me, but I am very positive I hit ammo.
In either case hitting ammo carousel irl will pop the turret every time. so historical inaccuracy there.
and ive personally saw radkamp90 in-turret ammo just goes black, so what?
does the bias only imply to soviet vehicles, or where are we going to move the goal post now when vehicles from other country also show the same issue
1 Like
every tank has a chance to not die to ammoracking, especially spaa
1 Like
You can’t win brother
It’s russian bias even if the rng is swept across all auto loaders + auto cannons.
3 Likes