Yeah I grinded out the obj279 but I rarely play it if at all. I am honestly more mad at myself for missing the EBR-1964 and amx-50 to930 (they are way too expensive om the market rn. Would have made my french lineups even more fun since I pretty much play nothing but france nowadays anyway.
And the fact that only 1 out of 3 ingame EBRs is tech tree is kinda mad. At least I got the 1954 one as consolation
This isn’t about banning something others have and you don’t, it’s about how it was done by Gaijin.
We have previously mentioned our plans to hide vehicles that were never fully materialized in real life as a complete vehicle
They clearly didn’t want people to research and play those fakes from that point on, but they allowed them to be played anyways, which is honestly mind numbing. It’s perfectly comparable to not applying BR changes for a specific vehicle to people that already have the vehicle, which is equally stupid.
You are mixing up “historical” and “realistic”.
Okay so you can explain how I’m mixing them up and how, for example, Coelian falls into one of those groups.
In what way is it unrealistic? The guns were build, the chassis is of normal Panther. The turret isnt anything special, it all can be build.
If it wasn’t unrealistic it wouldn’t be removed from the game, it’s one of the easiest things to deduct and you’re still arguing that in 2026.
It was removed because it was not built and it had no dedicated parts built only and specifically for it. Thus it does not meet the criteria for being in game
Yes, thus it’s an unrealistic vehicle.
It’s not unrealiatic though. It could have easily been built it just was not.
My point in asking this question is because the Marketplace can’t be implemented for Xbox and PS. Last I checked it was against their ToS to have a third party marketplace like that be accessible.
So again, I ask the question; how do you solve it? The short answer is you don’t.
And I stand by this. These vehicles are veteran vehicles. In the same way the M24 TL is, in the same way the P-51A is, in the same way the Swordfish Mk. II is, in the same way the TD vehicles are, or event vehicles, etc. etc. etc. not everyone has everything- that’s just how it works. Sorry.
I am fully against the idea of returning old removed fake vehicles and event vehicles. It’s simply not fair to those who took the time to grind out for them back in the day to just return the vehicles (marketplace is different because of limited # of vehicles and the cost system is different), especially events like the build-a-vehicle ones with resources which were hell to do.
People can easily build many things, but it isn’t real until it’s done.
Just because McLaren can easily build a delivery truck doesn’t mean that McLaren delivery truck is a thing.
It was removed because the vehicle unique part (turret) wasnt build and thats ahistoric, not unrealistic.
Yes but real is not the same as realistic.
Coelian driving around in it’s current form is unrealistic though.
Nope, just ahistoric. Its still a panther hull and a videogame. The in game Flakpanzer 341 is based on the final 3,7 cm variant drawings. Nothing special, nothing unrealistic.
So you’d be fine with McLaren delivery truck being in a sim racing game where devs are trying to depict vehicles how they really are ?
If it was modelled realistically why not?
You are still arguing the wrong thing. I am for the coelian being removed since it does not meet requirements to be in game. But let’s atop pretending that it’s unrealiatic the germans could have actually made it a real thing if they wanted.
I can draw many things, doesn’t mean it’ll come to fruition.
Coelian we have in game was never a thing and as such is an unrealistic representation.
i mean can you classify the trucks they use for their F1 cars as “delivery trucks”? Technically they are delivering F1 cars
It is a realistic representation of what it would have been since the germans made a wooden mockup turret.
The one we have in game is not real but it is realistically what the germans would have made had they finished the project.
