My Trust Level got raised, the poll has been added!
It all makes much more sense if you consider War Thunder to be Pokemon Go with tanks and planes and ships, rather than a wargame.
That is frankly silly.
In WT you collect tanks, planes and/or ships to get complete sets… that are pretty much completely artificial in makeup.
Until you realize that you will always be troubled by irrelevancies like which tree should have XYZ…
1 Like
So if it doesn’t matter to you as “irrelevancies,” why do you care, and why would Gaijin care about making separate trees? They’re already “arbitrarily” divided by nations, so if your logic is correct, why wouldn’t it just be a Free-for-All or Battle Royale?
Sorry, but what you have said is again, being quite frank, silly.
I care for the mental health of players trying to navigate the gymnastics of Gaijin philosophy.
sorry that you seem to be stuck in the rut.
1 Like
Sorry I’m not suffering any mental struggle with this, I don’t know why you would. I understand what they’re doing quite simply, it’s just wrong. This thread has made it clear people don’t agree.
Sigh… yes, you completely miss the point.
Like I said - sorry about that.
You said something that didn’t apply and I told you it didn’t. Whatever you say, I guess, lol.
Is the BTR-80 a BTR-80A or regular BTR-80 and if its the regular one, why is is the regular one and not the BTR-80A? Yes it has a 14.5mm but it seems like the BTR-80A would just be a better vehicle in general and more worthy of being added to the game.
1 Like
Are you comparing war thunder to pokemon? Are you kidding me?
1 Like
It is a BTR-80A I believe but even then the Italian tree has had many of their own suggestions passed which would fit much better, such as the C13 T25.
4 Likes
Palmaria, Draco, Porcospino, Centauro ADATS, continuo?
Andare contro i carri armati, Book
I carri armati poco conosciuti del Regio Esercito, Book
I Carri Armati italiani, leggeri, medi e pesanti, Book
Volete pure i libri più moderni?
5 Likes
Approvo.
1 Like
Comunque sì, secondo me, magari sbaglio, prima di aggiungere roba estera a un albero magari sarebbe meglio aggiungere tutta la roba di quella nazione.
2 Likes
except the romanians and turks actually make sense . the hungarians are language and culture more similar to the fins and tech soviets. They only ever used TWO italian planes.
4 Likes
while the hungarian line as it is now do no fix any of the italian line issues i disagree with you.
still i’m curious. What you would add as a top br spaa or mbt ?
1 Like
Really? Don’t read the tips? That is, I also wrote above the Centauro ADATS and Draco
2 Likes
Only two? The CR.32 and CR.42, Re.2000, Ca.135, BR.20, Ca.310, Ro.37, and SM.75 is just two?
As for “related to the Finns, Soviet tech,” them being related linguistically when for hundreds of years they’ve lived separately doesn’t matter, and just because a country bought Soviet tech during the Soviet era doesn’t make them a Soviet addition. The US’ first tanks were an FT clone and with British help the Mk. VIII tank, I don’t see you telling Gaijin to but the US into the French/British tree. Is Japan, which used almost all US equipment for 20 years after WW2, being asked into the US tree?
1 Like
Sorry but was late and i didn’t have the time to read the whole discussion. While both would be a very welcome addition in the italian tech tree o must ask if they were build?. I don’t mind projects but many more would dislilke the idea of “paper tanks”
Also i can’t see a candidate as “top br mbt”