well no the Palmaria SPG for the argentine was with TAM hull (the normal Palmaria was with a modificated OF40 hull). Don’t get me wrong, I have Your same opinion if a country made a weapon or a veichle it should go in first place to that nation. In this case, I completly agree on the fact that Lynx should go to germany as well.
Believe me, ask any German to make you a Lynx and promise him that if I finish it by tomorrow he will have it in his branch, do you think tomorrow we won’t find all the finished versions?
You’re right, I forgot about this detail
There are just a lot of better Italian vehicles to add to that BR, certainly not the 2S1.
precisely, that we are suggesting a mess of vehicles for Italy, but it seems as if they don’t care about reading the suggestions (SANTO DIO, ci vogliono ore per fare un suggerimento e poi ti viene cancellato per una stronzata, ma vi pare possibile?)
I like to enrich my nation, but if the developers then add Russian vehicles to my branch then no, it’s not like that
Yes! I see you so much on these forums, I’m glad to have your inputs Nicholas!
BT-42, T-26E, Vickers Mk. E, ITO 90, and CV9030 were unique variants. The rest is up to the Finnish players to decide!
They developed and built it but they did not operated it partially because it was designed for the export market and the German Army already operates the Puma so there is no point for the German Army to operate the Lynx anyways
(Purtroppo è Gaijin. Mi hanno eliminato Centauro Draco e Palmaria a caso nonostante un sacco di fonti e foto.)
Gaijined.
(Sono delle teste di cazzo, è già da un po di tempo che la situa in sto gioco sta degenerando fra copy paste qua e la e bias assurdo verso il TT russo, infatti è già da un po che ho smesso di giocare) P.S. da quando hanno “aggiornato” il forum poi sono letteralmente sparito perché è letteralmente inutilizzabile.
Btw I’d remove the 2S1 and the BTR-80 which have no place in the TT. I’m fine with the T-72 since it’s already present in the German and Swedish TT (it’s already a mess, one more wouldn’t do any harm)
Io gioco solo perché voglio l’OTOMATIC e perché così gioco coi miei amici, per il resto basta. Il gioco è gestito di merda e fa sempre più schifo. Chissà se entro fine secolo vedremo una nuova antiaerea che varrebbe di stare a 11.0.
Look, let’s get back to the beginning, since talking is useless then let’s act, with your permission, could you create a multiple choice vote on what to do? So we give our opinion and see it with votes? @GenMaj_Knight
Also, have you noticed that the British and Germans are also complaining about the same thing?
Really there is a moderator who observes the chats? Come on, it wouldn’t be so bad to talk to you too
T-72M BR 9.3 without thermals, reverse awkward (this makes it inferior to Leo 1A5) so it doesn’t seem like an addition that improves our TT, Leo 2A4 BR 10.3 this forces you to play it with our 10.0 which will lead you to play against the 11.3 ZSU57 the worst SPAAG of the game so much that from 7.7 it has been moved to 7.0 sufficient anti-tank capacity but you are vulnerable to the 50 cal also this does not help our TT, ZSU23 very bad radar has a rotation of 90° you can also move it to 360° but the rotation remains slow you still have to turn the turret to try to compensate, this is a handicap especially when there are at least 2 enemy planes, however clearly lower than the OF-40 2x35 that we could obtain. The fact is that someone was blinded by the “Wunderwaffen”
Do you think we should just add it into the replies or make a new thread for it?
this is a good idea!
just edit the place, the leading part to make it a vote
do you know that you can modify the initial suggestion by putting a vote?
I don’t have the option to. I think it has to do with the Trust Level.
To the BR 9.3 they can safely add the OF-40 Thetis which is a prototype with a thermal sight clearly superior to the T-72M, it is also easy to add because it is a standard OF-40 Mk.2A, this would have helped the Italian TT .