Since the napalm has the damage they increase on the bases, the jets continue to steal bases and bases from players who want to play with the f111 for example, or even the su24, when they nerfed the missiles and the napalms did not damage the bases the gameplay was more beautiful also because the bombers did the bases and their role and the jets aimed to kill and kill the enemy team, it would be very very nice to see the napalms removed from the jets and left to the aerial ones like the su24 and f111, too bad only for the tornado that not having the napalms would suffer the same but in the end it would not be a big problem since they are very very fast
2 Likes
I’d rather hope they change the bases and base killing mechanics completely, especially for higher tiers.
Atm we have large areas where one simply has to drop one’s bombs onto to do damage and kill a base. The area where damage counts is also quite a bit larger than the actual visual representation of the target (the buildings/grounds/camps).
This may have been fine at the beginning of WT and for earlier warfare (WW1 to, say, Korea), where carpet bombing area targets may have been the way to wage war.
The more advanced tech got in WT, the less sense this makes: CCIP and CCRP allow precise dropping even of unguided bombs, and using guided bombs on those area target bases makes even less sense, because the precision and accuracy of those weapons doesn’t matter in the slightest.
So I’d rather have them create new mission targets consisting of multiple individual targets (buildings, bunkers, vehicles, …) that need to be taken out individually instead of a HP style large area mission target.
7 Likes
Oh, and different individual targets of course would need different weapons. Good luck taking out a HAS (hardened aircraft shelter) with napalm, but then napalm may work very well against logistics areas with multiple vehicles, etc.
3 Likes
Yh like big bases where Only bomber can destroy the base and little base or secondary base where everyone can destroy it but with less RP and SL
1 Like
The F-4 B, C, And E would like to have a word with you. Oh the A-6 and AD-2 and 4 has joined in as well…
All they need to do is just properly make each base a proper size of a base.
With different sections giving different types of points. Aka ->Bomb the fueling district=results are more AI planes will be seen stationary, or possibility of the rear gunner on some crafts to be used as a makeshift AA of course to very little effect. Make them interact with the environment. So that bombers have a better impact on battles incentivizing players to actually defend them.
What u mean?
all those aircraft are not considered (dedicated) bombers yet they all historically carried and used napalm during Vietnam
Too difficult for the RB air the best thing is to put like 5/6 little bases and 3/4 principal bases that can be destroy Only by bomber like the su24 or f111
And man we talk about top tier and high tier not the 6.0 br
um those are all +10.0 except for the ad-2 and 4 …
And? They are fighters and they don’t need to have napalm to do a role of another aircraft
the a6 is an attacker and the f-4’s are fighter bombers, ya know multirole stuff?
Remove the napalms and use other bomb
Aircraft are rarely one role…
No.
It’s not right that a player that wont use a bomber need to quit the idea to get a base Only because people spam the fighters with napalm
multirole
I’d much rather bombing be based off skill than just spacebar tapping as it is now. Like you would have to send a GBU down a vent shaft or something at the higher BRs, or perform deep strike missions against enemy SAMs, considering you can now dodge SAMs in the test flight i think it would be nice for that to be accessible to players. I should make a suggestion on how to improve ARB as a game mode and make it much more refreshing.
the f4c agrees