Minor sidenote: The Waffenträger has the long 88, but it reloads slower than the M-51 due to the single loader. I’m not disagreeing with you, so keep your takes rollin’!
Edit: Disregard this message. I now know what you’re talking about, now that you’ve reminded me lmao
I was referring to the Tiger E, which shares the BR, and is, although a pointless comparison, more relevant to this discussion than the, admittedly, shitty Waff.
The German Mains here are screaming about their Tigers dying to it, which is the only reason I’m even comparing them.
Ah, right.
Yeah. I’d normally not compare a Heavy to a Tank Destroyer LARPing as a Medium Tank, but I kinda have to in this case since they won’t shut up about the “OP M-51 slicing through their Super Tiger”
Okay then, but only because I want to and not because you told me to.
Btw, I updated one of the threads:
You mean people like you, as I actually like large maps. Means I can use the Super Sherman’s singular strength as effectively as possible.
Also you didn’t even shoot the same place. Nice failure on a static target.
So can the F2? Only the front hull armor is changed between the F2 and G, with the G having extra 30 mm plating. Even still the F2 has 50 mm of armor which is enough to stop such guns from the front.
Your right. My bad.
Either way, the G is better than the F2.
Couple things with this photo.
First of all if I recall correctly the fuel tanks are not consistent. As you can see on the first picture all the explosive filler is caught on where the fuel tank was, then the second one it went straight through and hit the engine which sometimes happens sometimes wont. From playing top tier I can tell you from experience that fuel tanks are very hit and miss and thats with APFSDS. Once you start using even more inconsistent rounds like HEAT and HEATFS the inconsistencies will probably happen more.
Second of all what point are you trying to prove? You have just messed up your own point, you tried using protection analyst to prove your initial point and now you have just proven for all of us that it is not accurate. Nice.
Says the guy crying about a one trick pony being too strong for him to beat. You want an up-gunned sherman with no stabilizer to be at 8.0. let’s not act like GNDM Panzer is the one being irrational here.
Is it likely that if the M51 wasn’t key to doing the Israeli tech tree few would even play it much at all? At 6BR is was all you had and not much more now.
You can meme all you want. I’m not the one making a ridiculous argument and failing to actually substantiate it.
That’s you.
M-51 do even more damage in the test, the problem is not the tank are players.
1 - I never said i have a single problem against this tank.
2- I never said this tank need move to 8.0.
More excuses nice. Maybe you try spend this energy and time in lear to play the M-51 correctly.
The main arguement here is “i sucks hard playing this tank so the tank is the problem not me”.
Here is some of my experience with this trash btw:
The only one making excuses here is you. Basically having a meltdown because there’s one single type of Sherman in the game that can Lolpen your precious German and Russian heavies.
You can go on and keep crying about it. I don’t care. You Werhaboos and Ivanboos always Cope, Seethe and Mald about the dumbest nonsense.
You see an M-51 and panic because it can lolpen you with inconsistent damage.
I see an M-51 and laugh because it’s an easy kill.
We are not the same.
FALSE. I support his BR change based in my experience playing the tank mostly.
Said the dumb allies fanboy.
Im boring one shot tanks with that thing, just because you are a incompetent player dsnt mean the M-51 is bad.
A lot of tank were easy to kill a suffer BR changes due his firepower and this is not a exception. Game need a big decompresion and is compeltely unnecesary this tank in 6.0.
Of course, i know how to play the M-51 propertly LOL.
Your entire post is full of Coping, Seething, Malding and Dilating and lacks any and all meaningful substance.
If you actually properly knew about the M-51 you wouldn’t be saying such ignorant nonsense in the first place. Simple as.
Thats all???
Again, your only argument is “If i cant, you cant”.
