1 Like
Having the same depression across the entire volume of the vehicle regardless of the angle.
And notice the common bit about the games you posted, thats right, you have people spawning more than 1 tank normally. This is not common at all to the point that gaijin even tried to bait people into playing more by giving them free top tier vehicles to use which changed nothing.
Congrats you lucked out and actually had enemies that gave you the option to kill them more than once in a select few matches, such is not at all the norm nor indicative of a benefit for the M1, especially given you have access to capture points in all of these maps.
It does not on the IPM1 as it lacks any sort of mentions that would benefit from 15+ degrees of elevation, as already said such elevations only come into play with anti-helicopter work and given it is the 105mm and not the 120mm with M830A1 you are better off using the commander .50 which is identical in use to the BVM’s .50.
Please cry more, like Ruskie mains have been for years now, ya’ll have had more than 10 years to get better.
Given you show up and vehemently defend Russian equipment in nearly every single thread talking about that that will be a hard no from me.
You are comparing the IPM1 to the BVM, the IPM1 has a stock HEAT grind, so yes it does.
Irrelevant, one vehicle has one and the other does not and you are basing the comparison off of utility, having the system at all allows for unique uses like shooting down helicopters, which the IPM1 cannot by default as it lacks a GLATMs.
1 Like
We’ve all dropped nukes in the Abrams even me. I’ve got two nukes, one with the M1 Abrams and one with the M1A1 HC. But based on your screenshots, it doesn’t seem like you get them very often. Probably once every six months, or even less. Just like everyone else.
1 Like
I’ve ended up using the chinese ones a fair bit to dome unaware M1s but it’s become harder and harder to do with the trophy HV :(
1 Like
Sure
Hello, this is called having logical reasoning
Stock the BVM also doesn’t have almost any side relict? should we compare those?
Why are you even trying to compare a spaded and stock tank?
Also, you unlock your first apfsds after maybe 6 games, not that deep
Acting like an ATGM is some crazy helicopter killer, their maximum usable range is ~4km (being generous) and they get LWS for 15s, they are incredibly easy to dodge, a normal apfsds aimed by eyeball mk.0 is more dangerous
1 Like
Do you know what lucked out even means? the dude’s Abrams is averaging 5kps and has enough matches to indicate that he is consistent enough that this happens very often. If he kd is 1 then he posted a match of him having 20 kills then you can call that luck bro you probably the biggest case of copium I’ve ever seen lol
Loooooooooooooooolman
2 Likes
what depression bro
(It’s a Russian tank, there is none)
1 Like
These are outlier matches, but it is a benefit nonetheless. Sitting on a capture point to restock ammo takes ages, and makes you a very easy target, considering you can be attacked from so many angles.
I meant situations like this. A NATO tank wouldnt have to take a hit like that (idk how he nonpenned tbh). It is most definitely rare, but it does exist.
Maybe it is a valid complaint? Or are you too ignorant to realize it? You only realize what you had once you lose it, go grind out Russia for me.
My username is right here, you can check what ive been playing on statshark. Its not letting me attach a file so ill reply to this post.
I dont take into account how a vehicle is stock. Vehicle comparisons should only be done in a spaded format.
Hitting a helicopter with that missile would be an amazing feat, too bad it doesnt happen. You are better off lazing him and shooting APFSDS at it.
1 Like
It’s funny to me that you have a nearly 10% higher winrate in the M1A2T as opposed to the U.S. M1A2
1 Like
The teams were definitely better, but now it is the opposite due to heavy cavalry.
I figured as much, All of the CH3AT guys in the WT Discord have been saying the U.S. Teams have been steamrolling since the Abrams buff.
2 Likes
Good to see that you agree that one life leavers in matches are a long standing issue.
Good to see that you also agree with me that vehemently defending all Russian equipment across the forums is a indication of being a Ruskie main.
We are already comparing stock vehicles, unless you somehow think that the IPM1 somehow has better lateral protection than the T-80BVM which is laughable.
I am not, have you forgotten that the BVM now gets a dart stock?
One vehicle gets a dart stock one does not, if you do not like the comparison being made take it up with YEARoftheABRAMS, I did not choose the vehicles being compared.
And you are acting like it being present does not provide any utility at all like the original argument claimed, such was a example of a use case, as already stated, the IPM1 has no such option regardless and is thus cannot benefit from the utility of having a GLATM, and of course HE-FS as talked about earlier.
Not even going to respond to this as someone else already made a response to such.
Oh no -5 degrees of depression at all angles, what ever shall you do, I will go and have to enjoy being forced to +3 degrees in the entire 75 degree arc of all NATO tanks.
Get good.
Very much so depends on the map and cap, or, heavens forbid, your teammates actually being supportive.
I’ve gotten better at such as getting the most out of the likes of the T58 mandates that you spend time on a cap, otherwise you end up spending half the game waiting for your autoloader to be re-stocked.
That looks far more like a stab speed limit issue than a elevation issue given at the mid point of the hill the sight is at the height of the leopard and then shoots almost off the screen down the bottom even though the hill is evening out.
Also volumetric goes brrrrr.
Its as valid as a complaint as the NATO hump, yet every Ruskie main here tells those who want it to not be a thing to pound sand, so I choose to respond in kind.
I get to live with the NATO hump and you get to enjoy your -5 degrees of gun depression, suffer the same or not at all.
Statshark is not the fourms.
Got it, so how does the HEAT performance between both vehicles change, not at all I see, 3BK18M is still vastly superior to M456A2, if we are also comparing darts, 3BM60 is also vastly superior to M900.
Deflecting like the other guy, the IPM1 does not have it and the BVM does, it is thus a utility benefit the BVM has over the IPM1, as is the HE-FS you’ve already mentioned.
Hi, there’s no point arguing with them. They’re the kind of players who always end every debate by showing their stats. There are about 5-6 people here who constantly defend Gaijin and insist there’s no nation imbalance. Then they pull up their stats, showing a 2.0 or 3.0 K/D with your nation, and tell you the problem isn’t the nation—it’s you. They all use exactly the same talking points. It’s like they follow a script. I’ve brought this up before, and honestly, it makes me wonder if they’re bots working for Gaijin.
1 Like
Bruh what ? Having the same non existent gun depression all around is better than having additional depression on front and sides ?
Not true, there are plenty of maps with hills, where gun elevation comes in more than handy.
Glasshouse
People who play multiple nations at top tier and actually see both sides = Russian main
People who only play one Nato nation, but know everything = Not biased at all
I can’t even remember the last time i saw somebody shoot down a helictoper with a barrel launched atgm.
Because it shows who understands the game mechanics. But it’s somehow (mostly) the people which don’t understand those mechanics, which complain the loudest and scream for changes.
There is and will always be imbalance. Doesn’t mean there is bias.
Is it wrong though ? It clearly shows what is possible and that you are not able to achieve the same thing and maybe should try some self reflection. But getting mad about it is easier.
1 Like
Scroll up, I’m not repeating myself.
This is exactly what I mean. You guys spend all day here claiming there’s no bias whatsoever. Why? If you’re so successful playing the US, why do you constantly defend the USSR every time someone brings up balance?
It’s never stop being funny how these kind of player players
Trying to teach these players
Sorry, but I think 10 years isn’t doing anything to us. I think to reach your results we need to play with our eyes closed and one hand tied behind our backs to “get better” and reach the glimpse of your level
1 Like
