Regarding the Hull Armor of the M1A2 SEP V3

I’ll just take a screenshot of that for evidence

2 Likes

1 step ahead of ya

1 Like

Do we have this metal circle thingy modelled ingame? Is this pic even real?
image

1 Like

It is real, the metal with circles is structural, which is why Gaijin isn’t relfecting it in the model

5 Likes

100% agree, I’ve quit. For the Chally, Abrams, Leo we have to have full blown analysis to prove the capabilities. Mean while they raise and lower ERA however they please. It’s pointless to play a game that hates their own player base to this degree.

12 Likes

Wouldnt it add to the armor? I guess it wont be much but it has to be something at least.

2 Likes

Well, if you have a case for it, please make it, I think any improvement in armor would be welcome

2 Likes

I think you meant to respond to someone else. Otherwise I dont know what are you talking about

1 Like

Page 97: the armor module does NOT need to be significantly heavier to provide tangible protection improvements. Modern technology stuff.

weight
weight

27 Likes

Good news, if the hull cannot be penetrated by 3bm42 then it’s a good thing.

3 Likes

Page 1:

1 Like

It still applies to heavier vehicles

2 Likes

Still needs accurate values

guys its sad to say, but gaijin will not improve abrams they way you like

2 Likes

Instead of looking at a single header line, take an actual look to Pages 97 and 98.

I assure you the “70 to 80 ton platforms” are certainly not lightweight, and that the “M1A2 SEP variant tanks” it speaks of aren’t “lightweight combat vehicles” either.
weight

13 Likes

Did relikt buff need those values?

1 Like

No.

37 Likes

They’re clearly acting otherwise, what is this text supposed to prove?

cause you don’t read all of the devblog

A baseline improvement number.