I mean if they can fake Relikt ERA effectiveness with the Ukraine war showing it sucks they can fake buffing armor at this point. Only reason to grind Italy is for L3 content at all BRs.
3 Likes
L3 content at all BRs
certainly the only reason why I grind Italy
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Lol, you made me laugh out loud. Ever heard of the Leopard 2A7s? Str122Bs? Heck, even the T80BVM requires fewer brain cells to play than the abrams.
I appreciate your attempt to deflect from the problem in that Gaijin elected not to implement DU hulls on the M1a1s and later abrams with the red herring that those “variants” weren’t added. Well duh… that’s the point.
Adding an LWS was probably the weakest prototype upgrade they could have given the abrams at the time considering the US has mounted miniguns and APS systems on them well before Russia added them to the T-90M.
Hahahahahha. It’s now a double standard to point out the double standard? Oh that is rich.
“I like the RU being-strong narrative of this game”
“You have C&P M1 and Leopard so shut up”
“Aye, look at the spec… they are better than our educated-guess-T-series”
1 Like
Yes, playing t-90m is such a pain in the ass because of the non-existent reverse speed and lacks gun depression, bvm imo is the only 12.7 material. If it weren’t for the extra bit of armor the t-90m will be 11.3 because it will just be another t-72b3.
I’ll list down why I think the t-90m suck base on my experience
-
non-existent reverse gear in a br where miliseconds matters, you are exposing yourself longer for enemy fire. You are too slow to reposition should the enemy comes from behind. In cqc maps you are often a shoot once die tank due to long reload and you will keep running into this situation.
-
7 seconds reload, slowest reload time in its respective br, you don’t have the same windows of time to disable/kill enemies as NATO counter parts which is at 5.3 seconds. Furthermore you run into a situation where you head-on an enemy and non-pen/non-crit each other then they will fire the next bullet while you still reloading.
-
lacks gun depression, while not being as bad as chinese vt-4s when the barrel is within the front hull, it’s bad enough to a point where you can’t use the same camping positions as NATO counterpart. Also due to the lack of engine power the bvm can crest a hill much quicker so it gonna lower the gun enough to point at the target quicker.
-
Tall mg turret (similar to the tea table situation of Challengers), you are always exposed on maps like marginot lines and remain visible to enemy light tanks so you will maintain a marker on your ass, this happens when you peek the hill with a binocular, while you can stay invisible with bvm, 12.0s abrams and leo 2a5,6/7 because they don’t put trash on top of the turret. With 100 foot tall trash on top of the turret, enemies already anticipate and preaim before you pop up to shoot. Not to mention you will attract spikes like cow poop attracts flies.
-
Ugly tank (I know its subjective) as ugly tank makes me perform worse bro it is what it is, I already feel disgusted looking at such an ugly tank in third person view, almost as ugly as the M1296 that looks like a toilet bowl.
Only thing going for it is the ufp armor, side armor and spall liner occasionally absorb darts and vibranium turret chicks, all those armor isn’t enough for the tradeoff for mobility, @Rafale和歼-10C百合 right? it has the best turret chicks in the game bro makes the one on merkavas feels like pepper.
2 Likes
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
I dont take their words seriously about T90M tbh.
Its a good tank, sure not the best one but far from bein trash.
1 Like
Not only that it is trash, it’s also ugly as hell which makes it worse bro despite both being in the same br, the v3 in its current form is in a different league. Also unlike other t series, the t-90m also prone to ammo cook off when shot in the turret chicks bro it can go down to 12.3 or 12.0 yet it will still be crap
1 Like
Sure buddy, keep telling yourself that (especially on ugly part).
T-90M does look ugly tho
1 Like
If you think that tank looks ugly you have low level taste in my book.
This thing looks so much better than BVM.
1 Like
Yeah nah. They removed the cute eyes when they went from T-90A → T-90M and also the back of the turret looks squeezed. Even the FCM.36 turret looks better then T-90M turret
You lost me there.
You definitely needs to get your eyes checked bro having Leopard 2 around has set a baseline of what is truly beautiful, the t-90m just like an ugly duckling sitting next to it, you can put both tanks side by side, then ask your wife and sisters which one is handsomer, they definitely won’t pick the t-90m.
1 Like
FCM.36 looks adorable. T-90M is ugly as hell. I’m fine with the hull but the ERA makes it look fat and the turret is ugly
And who said Leopard2 is ugly? Dont twist my words.
Just because someone likes T90M design doesnt mean they cant appreciate other tanks.
My most played German tanks are 2A5/A6 buddy.
See this is where your problem begins, instead of enjoying both vehicles you always compare them and tell yourself one is trash while other one is the best.
Both tanks looks gorgeous in my book and there is nothing you can say to change my mind.
You do you then cause it doesnt ugly for me.
Tbh T-90A is beautiful. T-90M looks like a goblin next to it
For me its the opposite.