The Abrams has a recorded reload time of 4 seconds.
1 Like
I seriously dont understand people especially the guy who copes about T90M.
Whats wrong with liking 90M designs? People can have different taste but i guess my subjective tastes should be mold according to their visions.
God internet made everything much worse than before, at least people use to respect other people’s opinion even if it didnt suit them.
Iirc an experienced loader can reload faster than 4 seconds.
1 Like
It’s simply ugly, Merkava is fat but atleast it’s still somewhat beautiful, likely in the BBW category. T-90M on the other hand…
By the way bro? do you happen top be single? I can introduce you my sister who is currently also single, she has this handy dog called chiwawa or something and she keeps calling it cute, in my eyes that rat looking dog just downright fugly and disgusting, at this point I don’t even know what is f****** wrong with her anymore. Since both of you likes ugly stuffs, chance are both of you will immediately “clicks in”? like what mission both of you are one? somekind of Rebellion Against Perfection or Humor and Irony?
2 Likes
I hate Chiwawa’s buddy…
I prefer to pet my Rotweiller or my Doberman rather than getting close to that ugly little demon.
I disagree with this, it’s decent looks are why I’m stuck in this endless cycle:
-
“Oh yeah I still need to grind the T-90M Arena because it looks cool.”
-
starts playing top tier Russian tanks
-
“These tanks make me want to jump off a bridge, I’m never touching top tier Russia again!”
-
2-4 weeks pass
-
“Oh hey I still need to grind the T-90M Arena because it looks cool.”
And this just repeats again and again and again.
Yet even the 12.0 Abrams are easily on par with or arguably even better than even the 12.7 Russian MBTs.
Now we wait for your usual skill issue cope posting.
2 Likes
Same here but I got stuck with TDU solar Crown on these days and barely play WT.
When I do I mostly plays Jets or Click-Bait.
1 Like
Same situation here lol I already spaded both Abrams Throphy and V3 and somehow the T-90M Arena still 300k rp away, that 100k point is from bvm carrying all that weight alone as I can’t stand playing that ugly ass t-90m. Not only that its ugly its also trash.
1 Like
Same, been putting WT on the backburner as well. Playing HZD and HFW and trying to get my PC to fully work again.
I prefer the T-90M over the T-80BVM looks wise, it’s just that my adhd brain is not compatible with the T-90M playstyle.
1 Like
bvm is also ugly, but not as ugly as the t-90m imo atleast bvm has all that small silhoulette thing going for it, like I can actually peek the hill then kill something without them having time to react, t-90m just has a sign on top of the turret that says “hey shoot me please”, then inviting spikes and not been able to retreat from them because smoke is only useful if your tank can moved away from last known position lol
1 Like
I’m planning to upgrade my good old Rog Strix 1080Ti and 8700k with 9070XT and 7800X3D on these days.
Sadly current system isn’t enough for Solar Crown and I’m using lossless Scaling to achieve 100+Fps.
With new cpu+Gpu plus 32gigs of cl30 ram it will be monster for next 5 years on 2K gaming I believe.
1 Like
Guys, this thread is about whether SEPv3’s hull armor upgrades are properly modelled or not, and how they could be.
Not about whether the Abrams is the best performing tank in the game’s universe, nor about whether it “deserves” to be properly modelled like every other tank or not “b-because it has good stats during its initial release’s flavour of the month phenomenon”.
It’s funny how the War Thunder community always understands and wishes for every tank to be properly depicted ingame… EXCEPT the Abrams. Ah, the Abrams is the only one to be fine and even deserve artificial nerfs “b-because it’s so good it doesn’t matter/it’s balanced”…
Only certain people demands those artifical nerfs cough cough (famous group).
2 Likes
That used to be true before this latest major update, it’s not true any longer.
- M1A2 with Trophy just laughs at BMPT’s and helis, good luck doing the same with a 2A7V or Strv 122.
- This ain’t 2022 any more chief, the T-80BVM is incredibly average nowadays and your performance in the T-80BVM is certainly nothing special either.
- Strv 122 is indeed very strong still, but the main drawback is it’s long reload as opposed to the M1’s. Reload rate also matters more than frontal armour, and it’s not as if the M1A2 Trophy and SEP v3 have terrible armour now with their improved armour models.
Besides, if we’re going to act as though armour makes Russian tanks so much more forgiving: The T-80BVM doesn’t even have great armour to begin with.
It still uses the basic T-80B turret and that makes it one of the weaker turrets at 12.7. It also means you constantly get your roof armour penned even when largely turret down.
If anyone consistently struggles to pen T-80BVM’s, they’re simply suffering from a major Skill Issue™.
I don’t think you know what ‘‘Deflecting’’ means.
I addressed the argument directly and provided you with three problems of that DU hulls argument.
If you want to have the M1A1HA with DU hull armour in War Thunder, go ahead and make a suggestion for it.
In the meantime, M1’s are the best overall MBT’s in the entire game, even without these DU hulls.
PIN number.
ATM machine.
PDF format.
This is deflecting.
I asked you if you had the same issues with US prototype vehicles that only had extremely limited numbers (or even single digit) produced, you’ve neglected to answer that question.
Guys, this thread is about whether SEPv3’s hull armor upgrades are properly modelled or not, and how they could be.
Not about whether the Abrams is the best performing tank in the game’s universe, nor about whether it “deserves” to be properly modelled like every other tank or not “b-because it has good stats during its initial release’s flavour of the month phenomenon”.
It’s funny how the War Thunder community always understands and wishes for every tank to be properly depicted ingame… EXCEPT the Abrams. Ah, the Abrams is the only one to be fine and even deserve artificial nerfs “b-because it’s so good it doesn’t matter/it’s balanced”…
4 Likes
SEP V3 looks better so he picks up more chicks for the turrent and can’t be pinned unlike Pee-90M
The whole comment is a satire and sarcasm, i have no idea how to make it more apparent that i wasn’t serious. Not to deny that i’m bad, however right now with Trophy being given to Abrams and most likely to Leo in the future, Merkava became worse Abrams with reverse gearbox. Kinda lost it’s charm, Israel’s CAS is also not unique anymore with SPICE being given out dilly dally.
How do i make it more apparent that i do not wish for T-series to be nerfed to the ground but to make balancing equal across all nations, as i stated earlier T-series has been overbalanced for the sake of it being viable, NATO is scrutinized and being balanced for the sake of realism, this thread started with rant on how gaijin thinks Abrams’s armor is not that good and brought bunch of stuff to make the case for it. The same is not done to Russia, that’s why Ariette sucks and not changed but T-series sucks and artificially buffed. I.e. Italy can be bad because it’s most likely bad, Russia can’t be bad and overbalanced to be made viable. I.e. Italy can be bad as it is but Russia can’t and is buffed. I don’t want all tanks to be the same, obviously some are better than others, That’s why Merkava isn’t being sold, it’s highly specialized for specific Israeli needs, it doesn’t need to cross bridges that’s why weight was not a limiting factor in it’s design. Some would be good some would be bad, but it wont be artificial. That’s why they made BR system, no? Like this update which was supposed to be focused on Abrams has included more Russia buffs than Abrams’s like superior HARMs, Relikt buff and turret ring NATO nerf which conveniently wasn’t finished on T’s like it’s not enough of a repair sim already. Double standards and special treatment.
That’s a myth, it being hybrid doesn’t mean that it is jack of all trades master of none, even logically it is a bit naive to suggest that Israel who were battling against T-series tanks and are expected to do in the future made Merkava without thinking about their past experiences, it’s a modern tank and it doesn’t make sense that they have made an 80 ton tank with 120mm cannon, more than a meter thick armor as well as m338 shell to fight against infantry but not against the only tank series they expect. That’s a heavy overkill if we assume so and Namers kinda lose their point.
Alright, probably time to return to the original topic :P
What are those people you’re talking about?
I’ve been here long enough to know all “group” want a fair game.
1 Like
You know who they are :)
1 Like
STAPH!!! I don’t, I heard all people here has a good faith
At least they think so
1 Like