Unfortunately, the same thing happens with all tanks
Can a Russian 11.7 tank be killed from the front by a 4.0 tank…
Yeah exactly sit down
As for the Abrams they will most likely botch this imo.
And they were going to botch it but the community gave them pause.
What a fine argument, expected as much.
Bush abuser
Nice!
hot images
We had some fun with it
Hot Abrams in your area!
Nice images :)
Slightly of topic:
Is that first image just long exposure or is it taken through night vision equipment?
How on earth did all this get reduced to weight? Composite armor doesn’t weigh the same as steel—often significantly less. New versions show significant resistance to KE compared to “steel.” By the way, could you explain where the idea for the KE buff to RELICT came from? Where is the information about such high KE resistance available?
Furthermore, the developers didn’t see a problem with adding the 38MT, which was never mounted on the aircraft, and the manufacturer removed it from the brochure because it doesn’t physically exist—it’s just marketing. But, of course, marketing brochures won’t work in NATO equipment. There’s a Russian bias in this game, and it’s massive, but you’re trying to pull the wool over the community’s eyes.
Seriously, this happened to me twice in the same match. After that, I didn’t play Challenger 2 anymore. If only we could at least remove that urban combat kit. The tank isn’t bad, it just needs better modeling, but IT’S SO SLOW, MY GOD.
Lets talk CR2 reasons to be a top tier tank…
It’s slow, has weak firepower compared to every other nation
4 rounds at 4.5 seconds and then a 6 second reload
Horrendous damage model
Mobility
Armour, so many holes and weak spots no trunnion block, ineffective composite arrays
Can be killed by anything.
BN has a great APS system.
Take away L27A1 and all of them could be the same BR as the CR1
The first image is so beautiful
Just long exposure, nothing fancy
They simply couldn’t.
Def not a weak firepower, is 1 shot the most tanks, only T90M Leopards and Strvs is more than one, but is bad modeling and trash engine is bad, is fat like winston churchill, lower plate and driver’s hatch will be alaways a weak spot
An increase of weight doesnt necessarily mean more armor. The military over the years was using and experimenting with different composites. Each more effective at protection than the next with very little weight difference seen.


