Regarding the Hull Armor of the M1A2 SEP V3

I really doubt you have a working brain, THE ROLE MINE IS SITTING ON THE GROUND ALL WEIGHT IS ON THE GROUND…

They should name the armor package in x ray to be as clear as possible

2 Likes

1 Like

Much more lighter than the role mine…


And heavier than the LFP armour that would be added.

1 Like

If Russian MBTs get preferential treatment and they still remain average at best, how exactly does that negatively affect the game?

Unless you want them to also move down in BRs whenever they get “corrected to supposed irl levels”?

2 Likes

The abrams in this pic is not a Sep V3, is a more lighter abrams…

IMG_3518

3 Likes

Yeah idk why Gaijin made the Abrams xray model so vague in terms of armor.

1 Like

Surprising that Gaijin have not increased the armour values…We are all shocked

1 Like

But nobody knows that they’re secrets kept under seven locks

Is still lighter than a whole role mine, cope about this

Well CR2 could be 10.7 now with the massive nerfs

1 Like

And heavier than the LFP armour, which proves that the LFP armour would not cause issues.

Challenger 2 need a buff, fat tank so slow jesus

1 Like

Once again double standards. We need ABSOLUTE fact to prove that the armour of the U.S’ MAIN tank changed in FOURTY years. There’s no way it didn’t, we don’t know EVERY weight saving measure and the composite makeup could change without much weight change.

Also, the amount of Russian vehicles and the 2S38 that are built on data that literally just doesn’t exist in any public sphere but THEY keep getting changes and improved protection constantly. But the Abrams? No it’s never changed in 40 years of warfare armour-wise. Even if we don’t have hard facts, that just doesn’t make any sense to anyone who understands the situation of these nations and all the many facets involved.

21 Likes

So poor dude, it cannot be considered top tier anymore

Thinking that current CR2s found at 11.7 deserve to be at 10.7 is more than just funny.

2 Likes

Do you realize that the weight difference between the original T-80 and the most modern T-90M is only around 6 tons? If armor is ultimately limited by weight, and we’re talking about Kontakt-1, then the T-90M’s UFP shouldn’t be providing more than about 450–500 mm of protection against modern ammunition

5 Likes

Replying before
Flagged post removed by staff

2 Likes