No source or technical data linked…
Yet they want all the data for the Sep v3
21 Likes
That’s a bug
But it is not known exactly how much better it is, and compared to the APS, it will probably be a new vehicle
By what can be seen here they expecting 1000 KE protection from a napkin
Where are gaijin’s exact RHAe values for Relikt? By how much was it improved over K5??? “It’s better” isn’t a source!
2 Likes
It mounts to the front tow points and rests a panel against the LFP. It is in every way worse than that an added armor would be for weight distribution. The time spent on the ground is insignificant in operational deployment.
The TWMP and the Dozer Blade are legitimate examples of long-term increased strain on the front suspension commensurate with added armor. The logistical argument made by Gaijin is grossly overstated. However, the argument that “special armor” doesn’t exist on any operational Abrams outside of the five used for training is a legitimate argument.
8 Likes
thats the point sherlock, APS should be on the sepv3, not a different “trophy” abrams
1 Like
Trophy is possible for the M1A1 FEP as well. We’ll see if it gets it.
The wonders of modern sandwich armor (Ceramics + Glue + Rubber + Steel (or heavy metals like tungsten/uranium) + empty room). The ceramics get developed to break penetrators apart and deflect them on collision either making them miss the hull or lengthen the way to the hull to reduce their energy as far as possible. A really active field of study with “nano-particle structured ceramics” being one of the newest things to improve armor (AMAP uses this for example) without adding weight and keeping current dimensions.
1 Like
ofc I have it its ez to get I’m just not posting military documents on here go see for yourself
Look. We all know that Russian and Chinese stuff is not as technically robust as Western Stuff. The sad truth is that if this game was in any way realistic with modern equipment then only the Western Countries would be competitive.
A reminder for everyone. Gaijin has no idea how modern armor or rounds work. Why? Because it’s all classified. They base everything off of guesswork and a Chally I document. To imagine nothing has changed in 50 years is insane.
15 Likes
And how do you know already? do you have inside sources?
Since we haven’t publicly seen how much Gaijin is improving the LFP armor on the SEPv3 yet.
Not how sourcing your argument works.
Besides @Conte_Baracca just pointed out that the mine blades are in fact a good example of a similar load, so your point is a bit moot there.
2 Likes
Yeah I know, the fact that they just closed the dev and threw it in here as a fun fact that they already got their sources make me almost certain there will be no actual change
Only according the them it was under-achieving. I haven’t seen any evidence that it was. I’ve seen it eat rounds. They are doing this to counter the Abrams new round.
I put the sources I say how it works
And if that’s the case, it’s normal; it’s just a game. The aim was probably to counter Contak-5, and in any case only the auto-cannons were affected, but if you fires one you fire two shots
You haven’t even read those sources lol
Hey Stona, I removed the offending part of my reply given that it was edited out of the original post
However given that its almost a confession by doing such your reply does seem a bit un serious given the circumstances
Any normal player would be banned for up to 1000 years yet the only formal acknowledgment shown by the gaijin team is seemingly a gif joke asking people to forget about it
I personally think this comes across as rude and a slap in the face given the consequences for others
28 Likes