I can bring you all of that and it will not matter because the oponent can still die to a shot anywhere that isn’t the turret check.
What exactly is unreasonable about it? we don’t even know what the armor will be like.
I assume you wanted the SEPv3 to have enough armor to carry your significant skill issue?
1 Like
My point. They don’t even provide us with papers riddled with propaganda.
1 Like
I never said I was good at this game. I’m not even an American main.
And all the armor that the T-series have also doesn’t matter since they are so incredibly easy to kill.
Thank you for this, I’m sure plenty of people here appreciate this.
Gaijin however have a strict rule of no changes based on word of mouth ((unless you are some guy in the British mod saying that the engine of CR3 is worse than it is in game, despite him talking about CR3 production and not TD, and even then he was wrong, then that’s fine))
Sadly I think this will come as a mute point.
3 Likes
Assuming you mean Abrams, there’s UFP which overperforms against every dart in the game. It should not be able to ricochet even DM23 105, yet it effortlessly bounces DM53.
Yes LFP we all know. I just don’t appreciate the clear double standard going on here. Nor do I appreciate the lack of transparency regarding certain buffs.
2 Likes
500 kg is like B-Tech to C-Tech
About 150mm in hull increase on Leo 2A4 → 2A5
Theoretically it could protect upwards of 500mm but I think they’ll just do DM33 120 or Mango.
Sidenote, 2A5 and 2A6NL are overperforming in terms of armor, they should be 500 kg lighter and have B-Tech.
4 Likes
Not particulary unreasonable in context, its a decent guess
1 Like
your right
the MCBS will cause much greater loading than 4.5 tons of armor in the LFP
because the significantly longer moment arm
1 Like
you may want to remove the offending item in Jaden’s quote too
1 Like
seem like they really have another information
1 Like
I mean, what am I supposed to do? I don’t have access to logistical records. Also those aren’t for public consumption. Besides, as they say, a picture is worth a thousand words. And the TWMP and Dozer Blade, to me, put paid to the whole logistical side of the argument. The real argument is moot though. It’s pretty clear there is no “special armor” on the hulls of tanks other than those five. Their weight and public document analysis is pretty freaking sound.
1 Like
It’s also nowhere near 4.5 tons of armour, which is my point. The MCBS is heavier and on a longer arm.
Why is this not considered a source??:
"The Army began fielding the Abrams M1A2 SEPv3 in
4QFY20. The Abrams M1A2 SEPv3 is an upgrade to the
Abrams M1A2 SEPv2. The upgrades include:
- Power generation and distribution to support the power
demands of future technologies - Compatibility with joint battle command network
- Survivability enhancements including Next Evolution
Armor and reduction in vulnerability to IEDs including
those controlled remotely - Improved lethality by providing the ability for the fire
control system to digitally communicate with the new
large caliber ammunition through use of an ammunition
datalink - Energy efficiency and sustainment due to the
incorporation of an under armor auxiliary power
unit (UAAPU) - Improved silent watch capability"
Why is it that gaijin chooses the source and not the actual and most authentic source?
But the Director Operational Test and Evaluation is not considered legit??
12 Likes
Bonus points for it being a politician with no actual knowledge of the matter too
1 Like
Because it just says it’s better, but by how much? 20 mm, 50 mm, 100 mm, 2000 mm? You know the answer ?
If we are gonna talk about the armor then the v3 is barely better or an upgrade from the v2, also its missing the APS on the v3, so if you are still complaining about the armor then I guess its a you problem lol
Pics or didn’t happen