You go American mains, maybe we can get the other nations MBT issues addressed too.
19 Likes
Check this out
9 Likes
Imagine if the BMPT was held to this level of scrutiny!!! 😳
12 Likes
Brother, trust when i say they don’t even read the evidence because it wouldn’t support their own personal ideas.
1 Like
Well, it’s getting a major nerf offensively speaking—their cannons are getting a LOT of dispersion—.
4 Likes
1 Like
Bro, they made an entire devblog because US mains were getting upset about abrams armour…again.
This is the 2nd time they had to do this.
While yes this is true, several sources on the SEP program say theres internal improvements to the hull armor. What this hole post is implying is the hull armor is the same from the 1980s.
So we wait years for a copy paste sep v2 with aps when both tanks couldve gotten the aps? Great addition i must say. Great job, only took 2-3 years.
PREDICTION!
The M1A1 FEP will come 2 YEARS from now in addition with some other aps tanks.
Its a pattern, ounce every 2 years
APS vehicles are generally a new addition.
And I welcome this anti-BMPT APS Abrams with open arms
1 Like
Couldve been a modification.
But it isn’t and probably will never be.
Or atleast foldered with SEPV2
1 Like
I dont think that there is a single tank that have aps as a mod, all that have one needs to research a new vehicle
Well thats my point, the lazy abrams we got (SEPV2) was half baked and for a while not worth grinding
1 Like
This. Typically the harder a metal is the less ductile it is. It is also more likely to shatter or deflect at oblique angles.
I was with Gaijin when they said that SepV2 didn’t have DU. The wording was really conflicting in the documents. But when i read about V3, it was clear as day that it did have DU. It clearly mentioned “Heavy Armor System”. I thought that would be irrefutable proof, but here we are.
9 Likes
pretty sure he’s talking about the leopard 2s not having the correct armor, but hey love the crab bucket mentality you seem to have going on, that’s sure to make you friends.
there’s been just as many reports about the leopards hull (which is FAR more vulnerable than the Abrams so not sure why you’re crying about that).
the change is ONLY happening to the sepv3 (which isn’t even out yet) so yeah pretty fast LMAO.
Why do America only players have such an ingrained victim complex while being the most handheld tree?
I applaud whoever had the brilliant idea of posting this on a Friday; they’ve really been paying attention in their political science classes.
I’ve played this game a long time and while I only ever really play UK and USSR I am finding the difference in the treatment of nations disgustingly obvious. I want USA to be a good top tier nation. Not just for the sake of their players, but so that we have something to actually compete against. Playing USSR is not even fun because you just win every match without even performing particularly well.
This whole post is a weak response to a lot of fair criticism and good evidence from many, many people who have given their time and energy to making bug reports that seemingly are just discarded. To me, this is proof that the balance decisions of this game are not made based on evidence - but ideology. Even further compounded by the decision to make this post on a Friday in hopes tempers cool over the weekend while people aren’t paying attention.
I just want this game to be good.
17 Likes