Wow thats crazy first source for NGAP armor it literally is a light weight armor designed for future atgm’s and kinetic problems. Good on gaijin.
1 Like
Hey, we really appreciate you, Gaijin. You did some actual research. But, it’s not very cool to use the dev’s idea and understanding of engineering, which could be uninformed or could even be biased (nothing related to Russians when I say that). Just because you (Gaijin) think that if there is more armor, there has to be a significant weight increase. As I said, using uninformed and unreliable understandings of these topics raises a lot of skepticism. You could also throw away the idea of “highly realistic” modeling since you have chosen to take this angle on the issue. At this point, just artificially balance the game. We shouldn’t have to suffer because of Gaijin’s uninformed and ineffective approach to problems.
2 Likes
why cant this company just be normal instead of having one of these bs posts sticking it to the community every few weeks
2 Likes
The upper glacis of the T-80BVM is at 60.5 degrees.
The Abrams lower glacis is at 53–55 degrees from vertical.
The difference is 5–7 degrees. That is not much.
1 Like
Devs and bug report managers are not the same people
Gajin working overtime to buff the Abrams armor as minimally as possible.
2 Likes
Yes, but it’s a bit unfair that devs can base their opinions on reasonable assumptions, while players are required to defend a dissertation on tank design in reports, with no guarantee that their reports will be accepted.
Honestly something like this would be enough armor upgrade to be useful but not to break the balance.
M1A1HC/A2 LFP= 380mm KE > 450/470 mm KE
M1A2 sep v3 LFP 380mm KE > 500/520mm KE
I really hope they don’t put 20 mm KE more of armor on the v3 and call it a day.
If you buff the armor of the HC you’ll have to place it at 12.7.
2 Likes
I’d suggest looking into how ERA works
It is at 68°.
Can he get anything right ?
3 Likes
i mean at 12.0 witch it currently sits with this change it will be vulnerable to all tier 4 modification rounds of its’ battle rating range (11.0/12.7) at most it will cover some of the stock rounds.
Another point: regarding the document you sent that states the weight of the SEP V3 with APS, will you include APS on it? @Smin1080p_WT
Its already a 12.7 tank easily, only 12.7 Abrams and 2A7/122 compare with it.
1 Like
yeah honestly the only thing that keeps it at 12.0 is the gunner thermal but it could be easily be place at 12.7 if they introduce 13.0
Gayjin ofc didnt take a look at weight saving measures mainly in electronics. Replacing old copper wires with fiberoptics saved 3-5 tons (atleast from what i remember)
Also funny how gayjin thinks they are smarter than engineers buildng tanks for a customer with 1.2 TRILLION USD funding.
Absolute cinema…
2 Likes
and lack of CITV
also that there are now two copy and paste premiums so they cant reasonably move it up without moving those up too