Between the M1A1 and the M1A2 SEP V2 are almost 10 tons of weight difference in Game but they have the same Armor, where did this Weight go if not the Armor? why are you only talking about much less?
1 Like
Okay? So torsion bars have to be maintained. We all knew this one.
Tank weight is not only armor…
trying to deflect that I’m right just quit
Refer to the above.
fyi it was in this post but let’s not go off topic.
1 Like
I’m not here to argue. Honestly most vehicles need an overhaul. Including Soviet ones, Soviet ones however get the quickest bug fixes.
My poor Merkava is just one of many.
1 Like
Get that Russian bias out of your head the problem is the whole game, but even more than the vehicles, it’s the game modes.
1 Like
So you don’t think the Soviet tree has the quickest bug-fix turnaround?
No
I’m not saying they are always better. I’m saying they get preferential treatment that impacts the game negatively.
3 Likes
You would be mistaken.
no
I feel people too often conflate preferential treatment with being ALWAYS superior. These are two fundamentally different things.
5 Likes
What do you think the real weight change was for just the hull armor? I noticed they glossed over the APU being lighter and the copper wiring replacement
5 Likes
You are entitled to your opinion. I have nothing to prove to you.
Exactly.
Equating armor performance solely to total weight is outdated. Modern upgrades are all about optimizing the material density and internal layout. Dismissing performance gains just because there’s no ‘visible’ change in design completely ignores how modern composite armor actually evolves.
9 Likes
The M1A1 and M1A2 SEPv2 don’t have the same armor in game lol. It’s poorly shown in the xray viewer, but it becomes pretty clear in the protection analysis.
2 Likes
I really doubt you have a working brain, THE ROLE MINE IS SITTING ON THE GROUND ALL WEIGHT IS ON THE GROUND…