That’s little compared to china’s absolutely shit new FnF missile, bad rwr for top tier helis, bad modelling for almost all top tier tanks, bad ammo, intentionally larger autoloader without benefits, bad reload, bad SPAA. I can give more but that’s all I can remember now. Japan gets something special with 4s reload and good shell, Chinese top tier gets none
1 Like
Let me reiterate: this is not the place to discuss which country, Japan or China, is inferior. If you want to talk about how weak the Chinese tree is, start your own thread.
5 Likes
At least you get fire and forget munitions, the only ones we get are mavs.4 second reload in exchange for armour that can be penned by a German short 75 frontally, a mobility system that gaijin cannot model correctly and the gun handling of a 9.0 br tank (it should be 40/40 like the leopard), not to mention having basically no supporting tanks in any other role
The comical part was sarcasm xD to mean its that painful its funny (not in a good way)
Wonder why gaijin could add to let us have a 10.0 br lmao, the Thai A-7 kinda lonely not being able to do crap
Really wish this was added aswell
2 Likes
F-104J, F-1 ,F-5A, AV8S Late, F-4EJ/ADTW, A-7E just vibing at 10.0-10.7 and has nothing at said BR
apparently the thai air was to “give more cas options”
but I do love to see me at a BR where I have nothing on ground
True but they’re mainly fighter roles, the A7e is a strike aircraft with nothing to strike
1 Like
F-4EJs are multirole fighters and F-1 is a Support fighter/multi role/anti ship fighter
but yea its sad to see them having nothing to really compliment them
I genuinely forgot the F1 existed lmao, haven’t flown it in air since I spaded it and has no real line up
1 Like
I took both the F-4EJ and F-1 as a 10.7 lineup currently is a copy paste of 9.7 but i hope they implement japanese domestic and thai ground vehicles for that BR
What would they even add for Japanese domestic 10.0? We have the STB/type 74s at 9.7 and then they jump to 11.7 with the type 90s
they could add the Type 16 (C5) as well as MMPMS/Chu-MMPMS as 3 things i can think off the top of my head
What about the Type 90 prototype? We could add domestically produced APFSDS rounds, or switch to DM23 for 10.3 to 10.7 rounds. We could also build the deck by adding Indonesian or Singaporean 2A4s.
2 Likes
Indonesian Leopard 2’s also and Kaplan MT / Harimau
The Harimau would make a decent 10.3/10.7 addition. Could it make a good lineup with Stingray? If it does come, it might share a line with Thai ground instead of Japan’s line.
It shares the same Turret with the Boxer MGS whilst being way shorter and having a 22 Hp/Ton with superior traction compared to the Boxer’s 18.9 Hp/Ton. It was tested with M1060CV APFSDS which seems to have better pen than DM63. (560mm @ 60-deg from 2km’s vs 430mm)
Agreed, it is silly that if you want to play the Oplot-M, a derivative of a Soviet tank, you have to play the Japanese tech tree.
It belongs in the Soviet tech tree.
Still missing the TVADS though. Would’ve been nice to have the Machbet’s cousin
Thai tank, Japanese tree.
4 Likes
It’s Oplot T and it export version “for” Thailand
3 Likes