This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
1 Like
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
1 Like
Okay, whatever you say, CIA agent. ;)
Chinese tanks are among the best in the game for their BRs.
While the 10.3s of other tech trees moved to 10.7 and 11.0, China’s are still 10.3 despite being as good at minimum.
China’s 8.0 lineup is amazing.
China’s top end is the reason I’m going for it. It’s an amazing lineup that I cannot wait to enjoy.
Agree, and so would be VT-4 and VN-1 once they come on behalf of Thai sub-tree
I think that Ukraine should be added to the USSR tree because it is represented by the USSR and since the USSR tree is not Russian Ukraine should be added
2 Likes
Yup
They do not
Well then at least they treat the japanese tree normally while treating the Chinese like shit
1 Like
What round has this Thai one got? Chinese one was just revived via DM33 and is really good at 9.0.
It got DM33 as well. Looks like a nice tank overall I would say, good APFSDS, thermals (even tho gen 1) + ESS will make a funny combo for engaging unsuspecting players, but the fact it is just ROC M60 TTS makes one wish for more unique option
2 Likes
Nice. Yeah, I took the Chinese TTS out after they added DM33 and it was fine:
I agree, though, a unique option is always better. It’s the same with Chinese TTS, there are so many Chinese options at 9.0 that I would never have thought about using TTS over them before the DM33. So reading OPs post again, he is more calling the TTS terrible because Thailand had a more unique variant of the M60 that could have been added, but they simply went the easy copy and paste route.
As always. Not news, but pity Thai ground is represented with only 4 vehicles, two of which are not unique anyway yet are good/average at their job
1 Like
The M901 would’ve been nice, Japan lacks a good ATGM carrier
1 Like
Japan missing a comical amount of stuff not to mention bogus reasons to not add things despite it physically being able to do a certain thing
china thinks they have it rough but guess what everyone else has it too ur not special
we have the Chu-MMPMS and MMPMS which if i recall both are approved as a suggestion but we are yet to see it
Japan casually having a full 2 br gap in ground RB will never not be comical (nothing from type 16 to the type 90s lmao)
1 Like
That’s little compared to china’s absolutely shit new FnF missile, bad rwr for top tier helis, bad modelling for almost all top tier tanks, bad ammo, intentionally larger autoloader without benefits, bad reload, bad SPAA. I can give more but that’s all I can remember now. Japan gets something special with 4s reload and good shell, Chinese top tier gets none
1 Like
Let me reiterate: this is not the place to discuss which country, Japan or China, is inferior. If you want to talk about how weak the Chinese tree is, start your own thread.
5 Likes
At least you get fire and forget munitions, the only ones we get are mavs.4 second reload in exchange for armour that can be penned by a German short 75 frontally, a mobility system that gaijin cannot model correctly and the gun handling of a 9.0 br tank (it should be 40/40 like the leopard), not to mention having basically no supporting tanks in any other role
The comical part was sarcasm xD to mean its that painful its funny (not in a good way)