I’m not sure if the Sla engine was ever fitted in a complete assembly, but it was built, for both the Tiger II and the Jagdtiger, at the Austrian tank plant whose name I can never remember.
Yes, I know, but it was never mounted on Tiger 2, only on the Jagtiger.
1 Like
I wouldn’t mind a Jagdtiger Sla… 😁😁
And thus removal or switch Tiger 2 H SLA to Jagtiger SLA, and looking how Jagtiger is played, i believe change of engine wont help it.
I’m not sure I get what you mean tbh
Look updated comment, sorry for inconvenience.
1 Like
I don’t think Gaijin would switch them, so if anything like this ever comes to the game, it would be as an additional vehicle… maybe in some rare event or battle pass.
I play the JT a lot, and I’d say I know it reasonably well, and I think that little bit of extra mobility would be very nice. Obviously not a game changer or anything.
Same here, they dont do it at all.
perhaps
In going forward yes, though in my experience fighting it, a lot of times i was constantly getting to the side of it or was seeing the side enough to penetrate it, it’s more the fact of awareness and fact it doesnt rotate itself that fast.
Panther II, Flakpanzer 341 and Tiger II 10.5 should be treated the same way.
Well, yeah, players with low situational awareness will always suffer, no matter what engine is in the back. The JT can’t be played carelessly. But if you use it right, it’ll treat you right. Imho the real difference of that little bit of extra forward mobility would be in getting to a good position that one or two seconds faster, which doesn’t sound like much but with a vehicle this slow, it’s not trivial, and how well or poorly you open the match can sometimes have cascading effects on everything you accomplish later in that match :D
1 Like
None of these vehicles had a real prototype built and two of them use guns which don’t fit in their modeled turrets.
Doesn’t matter and don’t care. They were added, so every player deserves to have them. Especially since they are so common in matches. And only the Originals are acceptable, no reworked facsimiles.
I’d love to one day be able to play the M60 AMBT
1 Like
It is nice, although you still get trolled by volumetric BS.
Ah, I am looking forward to playing Object 279 then lol.
Steps to make Gaijin re-add the maus:
- Wait like 2 weeks from now
There are no further steps: the maus will be re-added and available again.
Weird how yall accept this treatment for the maus but refuse to have any other vehicles treated this way.
Give me one good reason why the maus alone should be treated this way.
Can you quote where i said that I “refuse to have any other vehicles treated this way”? Thanks in advance
As has already been stated, the Maus was a real vehicle, the Panther II and Tiger 105 are not. The Coelian is as real as the Ostwind II, but Gaijin has proven unwilling to readd it for somewhat unjust reasons. Still, the Ostwind II does the same job almost as well. While it would be nice to have an unstrafeable AA at 6.7, I’m not going to call conspiracy just because they aren’t readding it. The Ostwind II works just fine more general AA work, and the Kugel gives you an unstrafable option just one BR jump higher.
If you want more realistic versions of those vehicles, push them to add the E-50 and E-75. They’re paper, but we have enough info to implement them in a reasonable way, and would have similar performance to the fictional vehicles we already have.
1 Like
Your initial comment seems to imply that you have become complaisant with gaijins targeted mistreatment of the maus by accepting its current situation and by telling people who disagree with its current situation to just accept it and wait 2 weeks or so and itll be ‘re-added’.