Upper NORAD subtree
1 Like
You blindly believe that guy because it benefitted your argument despite the fact that he posted no sources
Hell no
1 Like
I don’t talk to you, you just report people so their comments disappear
You’re mad at me because you broke the rules?
And how would you go about using them in a lineup?
1 Like
HAHAHA! you are the one bringing politics things, Canadian people don’t want their vehicles in the US tree!
How many times we need to tell no
They belong to the commonwealth!
2 Likes
The reason you want Canadian vehicles kept out of the US tree is political, you made that clear in the topic you made
It hurts no one to put them in both US and UK trees and wanting them excluded from the US is only because you hate the US or US players
1 Like
facepalm
Should’ve been a big enough arms manufacturer to become a tech tree, tough luck ig
You could run a hornet+LAV lineup with the US in the future though
1 Like
¯\(ツ)/¯
But if that’s not enough, we could always add on Australia and NZ.
2 Likes
Canzac tech tree when?
1 Like
Ngl, I would actually prefer this as it would give more room for both Can-Aus-Nz and UK-SA-India.
2 Likes
There are 4 CF-18’s and 6 CF-100’s, no counterpart of similar era/BR to those has that many variants in one tree. Not even the MiG-15, the most produced jet fighter, has that many variants in the USSR including premiums let alone tech tree
¯\(ツ)/¯ Still makes a full tree
Besides, Australia and New Zealand could always be given.
1 Like
When you want
If it comes it’ll be a fraction of the suggestion. And if it needs Australia and NZ from the get go it shouldn’t even be added in the first place
You could get that
Along with the CF-188 HEP II, M1A2 SEP, ADATS, SLAMRAAM, Tiger ARH, MMEV… Some more LAV’s I guess.
2 Likes
About 2-3 years ago then?