So nothing with a noticeable effect?
I believe crews would find having a British radio set having a noticeable feature
2 Likes
Nothing from this tank is Americans except the concept!
Americans: euuuh it’s a Sherman so American 🫠
5 Likes
Funny how i haven’t though since it says BAE systems on the manufacturers page, come back when you actually can disprove it
2 Likes
That has no effect at all in game
Who made them before 2004?
Who currently makes them?
1 Like
It’s like telling a rail fan the British rail class 08 is actually an LMS loco not a BR one because it’s looks similar to the Class 11’s
1 Like
No, but its what you keep trying to use, so if you wont accept your own reasons for one vehicle dont try and use them for others, because it amounts to what has transpired
Which considering the company is part of bae systems that is an accurate statement, try again or insert coins
Gaijin could end all this crap by simply recognizing the wishes of Canadians and not putting operator nations in more than one tech tree.
2 Likes
“only ever been manufactured” it isn’t accurate because it was United Defense making them from 1981 to 90s, not BAE
Same as how you stated the sherman hull is only US production despite the fact there is proof to prove you wrong instantly with the Canadian shermans, as i stated, if you cant take the logic for 1 vehicle, dont try it with another one
1 Like
I’ve already made it clear why BAE and the Bradley isnt comparable to GM/GDLS and the LAV’s
When did I say that?
Yet at the same time you also have compared another vehicle, being the sherman, to the bradley, or maybe you thought that would go unnoticed
1 Like
Canada in the US tree was already a bad idea, but I doubt gaijin would fix this
2 Likes
More incentive to buy more premiums to get all the vehicles of a non-tt nation
The Canadian people want a Canada tech tree? US and UK people tell them no
The Canada vehicles for the UK? The US people complain
The Canadians vehicles for the US? The UK and Canadian people complain
3 Likes