News Flash, you dont know how to read graps as you showed with the MiG-29 vs Mirage 2000
Nah, you play the plane you think its superior and i play the actual superior plane, after you dont even get to shoot a single time, we can change plane.
When you are in game send me a message in game
You mean how the graph showed the Mirage 2000 being superior in 1v1s…
I gave you the rules. I don’t trust you to not use water injection [which you run out of shortly after takeoff in a match IF you want to climb slightly better than the R2Y2], or set the fuel to the correct amount.
I don’t think moving the 7.0s - 7.7s down to 6.0 - 6.7 is a good idea.
We don’t need high BR prop BRs “recompressed” just cause 8.0 is “decompressed” in the wrong manner.
Since i showed him that he doesnt know what he is talking about when he claimed that the Mirage 2000 was better than the MiG-29, this is the second time he’s hidden his tail between his legs.
You want to get memed on again?
Last time I used the aircraft I said was worse than the Mirage 2000 in 1v1s: The Mig-29.
I gave you my rules for this as well, I will use the worse aircraft.
You bailed when I gave you these rules and now you’re claiming I bailed after you bailed.
I’ve been thinking about amended rules, but I keep thinking of ways someone that doesn’t want fair parameters to exploit that.
The preliminary alternative is large map 1v1, running out of fuel is a loss.
Hi All! Let’s avoid personal digs and keep things respectful, even if there’s disagreement. We want the forum to be a place for open discussion — not for taunts or gloating. Please stay constructive.