R-77s are horrid and the R-77-1 is needed

All missiles got big loft.

maneuverability nerf that does not matter

1 Like

Aint sounds like a buff, tbh.
And how much it been changed?

drag got reduced by like %7-8 i think. tiny

1 Like

Well, we’ll see.
Just hope, they dont make that back, when i get to my PC.

Now all missiles loft with 20-25 degrees angle

enough
Now it can get kills from 1.5 times more range, as was
So, 30-35 km

And more deadly in dogfights

Imagine dogfightin in the worst dogfighter at top tier the SU-27

2 Likes

I mean it does. The AMRAAM is by far the worst maneuvering missile, its turn radius is massive + its guidance delay went from 0.3 to 0.5. AMRAAM is still a top missile but the nerfs definitely hurt its close range performance.

And 95/100 times you use fox 3 at medium/long range. Maneuverability changes are the least important

2 Likes

A ARH R-27ER would break the game lol

More trouble will be in imagination of devs
Because 27EA not exist on regular planes.
Only few missiles exist

At least 3 been successfully launched by tests.

If LOSAT exist - i see no problem in more than existing missle, based on modular base of R-27.

1 Like

It’s as simple as a seeker change

1 Like

Can WCS operate with new seeker?

Losat added as prototype which fired missile, a specific MiG-29 that has been modified can be added, but for other aircraft you need to prove that their avionics are compatible with this missile

Wow, lets add all non serial vehicles/missiles/etc in game?

LOSAT not in TT, very different case.

HSTVL? Chally 2 TD? Leo 1A1 L44?

1 Like

Well
Yes, theyre not full serial
3TD not made yet
HSTVL even made in some funny way, with simplification.

But, for HSTVL at least some information, same as 3TD.
And for 27EA - no trustable information.

why do you believe information on this tank that doesn’t even exist yet?