Not R-60M, you could still flare it in an afterburning F-14B at point blank %70-80 of the time lol
Ahahaha I see, what were you saying about selective memory? Just reminding you about R-27ER.
Not really, I don’t remember the magics performance but r60s went for flares even more than they do now. They’d even pull 60g to catch a flare
I meant compared to now. Old R-60M has better flare resistance to now R-60M.
R-60M has the same 1:1 resistance as the 9L, the only difference is that it has a much wider seeker FOV
https://www.reddit.com/r/Warthunder/comments/113mtnh/datamine_223129_223133/
FoV and flare resistance nerf on the same patch.
1 Like
the band ratios were kept identical and lock range was increased overall, no total baring on pure flare resistance
Yeah and USSR mains were crying about T-90M that should be 11.3 because bad reverse speed. And now crying about not having the best missile in the class, git gud.
1 Like
Because one produces by other thing
Flare resistance was only because of fov
Btw, old 9L not hard to flare
Selective memory, the best word to describe you. ER, you can use your f14b with 300 chaff or fly low and its gone. You said the ussr always dominated for eternity, name all the times it did then
5 Likes
You were not there. The 9L was actually bonkers.
5 Likes
Also a question. Who made up that R-77 has worse notch and chaff resistance than AIM-120?
3 Likes
The 9L relocks an engine after being flared, unlike the R60M.
Yes.
1 Like
The R-60M also does that.
Hahahah good one, wanna see how many abrams threads there are?
2 Likes
Just in 16A ADF, yes, not here
seeker FOV is why
idk ask the shillers
In what case? Have you used the r60m before?