R-77s are horrid and the R-77-1 is needed

Arkadiy!!!

Have you switched to the CIS server?

Because of this



w/o USA

7 Likes

Average American main whose part time job is attacking everything Russian on forum, lol

6 Likes

Is there any way to filter a thread so you cant see kitsune_qq messages? Seems so off topic and irrelevant but like 90% of the messages on the thread im confused.

2 Likes

Yes

There has been over a thousand messages and many of them being complaints about the current performance of the R-77 and the fact that Gaijin hasn’t announced anything about it is extremely ridiculous and disappointing.

2 Likes

you aren’t owed better missiles

1 Like

I have all of UK aviation and have flown the SHarrier FA.2, even that with its inferior speed to the J-11A managed to achieve higher range than the R-77.

2 Likes

ok?

just block his account

3 Likes

From what I’m gathering, the solution to this is to implement variable drag profiles based on speed, rather than a bandaid fix with a more modern missile. That’s more or less what all the ARH A2A missiles that are underperforming need, to be fixed rather than replaced.

2 Likes

Anyway they needed to develop dome code for dynamic change of drag and etc

He started appearing literally everywhere and trash talking everyone lately lol

1 Like

Who cares, just block him and move on, same thing i did with other ppl that cause issues in every thread they go like MiG_23M

Ru forum is currently unaccessible for most of CIS players, so we all are here now.

Unleash the hell of ****posting!

Btw, theres no point for returning to Ru forum, at least while Columbus is moderator

There is no need for R-77-1, just slightly nerf AMRAAMs energy retention , significantly nerf uFo-16 and everything will be fine.

1 Like

Su-27 needs better FM with less energy bleed in instantaneous turn, so it would actually be a one-circle fighter rather then a flying punchbag.

5 Likes