Theres might be a trouble:
CBR, after discussion with devoloper already stated this
“There are no nonlinear coefficients in the game yet (technical limitation), but this will not make the plane any better, rather even worse.”
“Нелинейных коэффицентов в игре пока нет (техническое ограничение), но лучше от этого самолету не станет, скорее даже хуже”
That means we need Su-35S with R-77-1 and R-37))0)
Su-35S had too cool radar. I think ESAs will be added in next year after all non ESA radar will be added.
Already most non esa radars in game, maybe with few exceptions like a Eurofighter
Not only radars, planes with them, should be added before new era to no be dead on arrival.
Like gaijin cares, like Tornado or EEL wasn’t DOA.
I think that possible in 1-2 patches.
Btw, game not ready for new radars, game already cant implement APG-63 from 80’s
Su-33, F-14D, F/A-18, MiG-29K, MiG-29M, Typhoon DA2, F.2, FGR.4, MiG-35 in version without ESA, Su-27SM3, Su-30, F-15E. Maybe something else.
Su-33 already DOA.
Says the player who got my beloved starstreak first spawn removed because it killed an ‘impenetrable’ T-80 :(
Won’t compete very well if added with it’s correct 4.5 gen contemporaries since it’s a hybrid PESA
Well, yes.
But it already will be useless, 27SM already in game
Maybe for funny carrier ops
Only if SAC documents
Maybe they can add, but with less BR
Similar (mostly) planes, but maybe in update like a carrier ops, same as SU-33.
But maybe you can skip them, like a 9-12 to Ussr
Maybe there already no place.
Similar to SM, but with engines change(not confirmed)
Will it better, than SM, that already in game?
Maybe skip version with APG-70. In 2016(±) was update to AESA radar for standart USAF F-15E, but idk for IAF
I doubt there will be much difference between PESA and AESA in WT, N035 could be even have an advantage with ability to guide 2 R-27.
That’s literally just an SM with an additional pair of pylons and stronger engines. It’s not worth adding as a separate vehicle, just rework the SM into it, it could definitely use it.
AESA is simply much more efficient and powerful, an aircraft like the Eurofighter will simply have an easier time maintaining situational awareness with the Captor-E than a Flanker M with the Irbis
Many of the top tier airframes should receive MLU packages to model very similar variants or upgrades without adding new aircraft, this can be done for lots of the F-16As and most of the aircraft at top tier in general
PESA actually more efficient and powerful, AESA is just more flexible and can be used for EW.
The Israeli variants did indeed receive the same AESA and upgrade packages as US F-15Es, just with their own internal Avionics and a better DASS
American AESA have a jokes with LPI, which harms to SPO-150
By heat - yes, efficient
But not powerfuller
29SMT>29M>35(early). Also will give coveted TGP
9-12 and 9-13 are nearly identical. DA2 F.2 FGR.4 differ in flight performance, electronic equipment and suspended armaments.
Depends of version.
I think there will be 3 versions. Early with weak engines, without HMD and amraam 1 gen tgp, no IR mavericks, 9L+7F/M, mid version better engines, hmd, amraam 2nd/3rd gen TGP , and late version with aesa radar.