I haven’t seen you in a while lol, welcome back o7
3 Likes
thanks m8 !
1 Like
Never talked about the 120-c5 because im not knowledgeable on its capabilities or how it would impact the game, ive just pointed out that unlike myself youve been spouting nonsense claims on how the R-77-1 will perform in game (divorced from the reality we can already see on dev) based on what i can only assume are assumptions based on a dream you had the night dev opened because in no reality does the su-30sm or r-77-1s perform the way you think it does, which is further compounded by the fact youve never played a flanker/fulcrum or used base r-77s and therefore also have not even the barest minimum of an idea on what its currently like to play into BLUEFOR.
7 Likes
Holy yap bro you look really hurt and emotional there
Alright Shakespeare… if you really wanna talk about dreams I had some that night that I definitely can’t share here but the day after, though? I actually played both the F/A-18C late and Su-30SM, my takeaway? The Hornet is severely underpowered compared to other 14.0s, and the only real solution that doesn’t break the game’s balance is adding the C-5
Except, y’know, I have Like I said I’ve played all of them on other accounts
But go off, professor any other expert opinions on my previous comments?))
I can say the R-77-1 doesnt feel any different conpared to the R-77 during gameplay. Ive still not gotten any kills outside of against people not paying attention, or merged too close and got the first shot off.
Theres a lot of assumptions and nothing conclusive in this thread about the balance between missiles but gameplay wise it plays no differently.
Anyone flying low and your R-77-1 will miss 100% of the time.
NATO aircraft will fire before you do 100% of the time as usual, and youll still be defending far more often. Youll get 1-2 R-77’s off the rails and die with 10 still on pylons because you’ll never have had the room to re-engage anyways.
1 Like
Its subject to change and I hope they actually give it its full potential
NO F-15Cs are compatible with the PW-229, period.
The only none Strike Eagle that you could argue for PW-229s would be the NASA F-15B which also conducted the STOL/MTD and ACTIVE tests.
1 Like
it does not have “twice the range” u buffoon like be fr bro lmfao this is an obvious fake crying for a nerf cuz youre starting to get a competition finally😭😭
yeah thats true nato aircrafts always launch their amraams very soon all the time like at 50kms i already get hella rwr missile launches warnings
At this point ive left top tier air behind lol
Maybe against afk bots.
2 Likes
Any fox 3 can hit an afk target at 60km launch range. Realistic scenario is a target notching once it goes active, I have seen the R-77-1 being defeated kinematically due to how much drag it has
1 Like
While gaijin doesnt add dynamic drag no argument will ever be valid about the lattice fins R77s…
You might have missed the whole collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, Russia going bankrupt as the satellite states ran off with as much wealth as they could carry while corrupt officials sold state assets and secrets to anybody with a few rubles. from 1991 until 2000 Russia was run by Gangs controlling individual regions and a drunk as a state figurehead. And 2000 is only when they STARTED putting things back together. So yeah, they actually did have a 15 to 20 year gap in military R&D, while at the same time all the Soviet era advances they had made where sold off to the USA, it surprising that they got a little behind? Read up on the history of the Yak-141, it’s a good example of what happened to USSR tech in that period, and why Russia fell behind.
AMRAAM entered service 1991, meaning it had R&D before then. so his point still stands regarding the R-77-1 vs AIM-120A, since R-77-1 wouldve been later regardless
Always have been, lol.
before ppl say muh MiG-25 fast (i do like the jet), remember the YF-12
All the Xs as well.
1 Like
R-77 was showcased in 92
When did it enter service? And when was the first R-77 shoot down