It will do more good then making one as a bug report. That being said, honestly, at this point the missile will probably be implemented before a suggestion does anything.
“Forwarded as a suggestion”, is, funnily enough, not suggestion mod territory, so I don’t fully know. From my understanding though, forwarded as a suggestion would be for cases where the implementation in game is intentional as is, regardless of accuracy.
i fkn cannot understand how my derby report about the F-16C Block 40 got “forwarded as a suggestion” but the Python-4 for the SUFA DONT!!!?!? SERIOUSLY ANYONE CAN EXPLAIN THIS BECAUSE I DID THE SAME STEPS IN BOTH REPORTS LMAO
All nations has their 4th gen
So yea its better then the rest 4th gen thats why we saying it can come with nerfed irccm
And also tge f15e wasent rly needed cuz usa had other top tier aircraft but israel needs this missile
nono look at the time i did that report of the derby, the F-16C in the first devserver of that update 1 year ago didnt have the derby only amraams the derby was added later thanks to my report this is the same case am just reporting a missile missing from an aircraft like i did before sooo WTF?! am doing literally the same thing like i did before but 1 was accepted as a suggestion and the other one just got a “NOT A BUG” HELL NAH i cant with this double standard honestly.
Not historically accurate and underpowerd
f16i doesnt have aim120b so its extreamly vulnerable in close range and its not good at bvr against smt like ef2k or f15e (same br btw) and it has only 6 missiles
Give me a reason why shouldnt python 4 come(with nerfed irccm ofc)
Why cant israel ever get somthing good man?? ,we always get pure copy and paste. Theres a reason why i played israel and its for the reason of playing modifed american aircraft with unique powerful israeli weapons , gaijin just keep doin c&p ,c&p . At this point remove israel as a nation because we bearly have anything unique added
Bug moderator plays little god and picks and chooses. Then Snail plays bigger god and picks and chooses bug reports.
Simple as.
P4 is controversial missile, being better than its would-be contemporaries, while being inferior to “actual next gen” IR missiles like 9X/MICA IR/IRIS-T, hence Gaijin installed Python 5 right from the start on SPYDER.
Then there’s issue of Python 5 sharing airframe with P4, known upgrades being seeker, plausible upgrades being motor. Which implies flight model of this otherwise not thrust vectoring missile was already good enough to not warrant an upgrade there.
Derby bug report went without a hitch as you’ve met “compliant” bug mod, then Derby is a downgrade over AMRAAMs, so even easier to pass this through. If you were to ask for Python 3 for Sufa or 15I, it probably would be smoothest bug report ever.
Until you have some hard sekrit documents, Gaijin will continue to assume its the same.
P4 and P5 have the same weight and same propellant weight, slightly rearranged motor burn times. Different PID guidance table, P5 has higher max AoA for the fins and marginally higher fin acceleration. Thats it for flight model related stuff.
Just wanted to break down the arguments against adding the Python 4, y’all tag whatever devs should see this to actually get consideration:
“The game isn’t ready for the Python 4 to be added with its full seeker capability so we can’t add it.”
PL-8B, PL-5E2, and AAM-3 (just listing those that I know of) have all been added with nerfed IRCCM, being adapted to fit one of the two currently existing styles of IRCCM modeled in the game.
“Israeli planes can mount the Aim-9M so it’s not necessary to add more missiles with artificially nerfed capabilities.”
The F-15J can also mount the Aim-9M, why was it necessary to add the domestic AAM-3 at the time it was added with artificially nerfed capabilities? It’s nice to get to play planes with their unique armaments.
“Okay well even if you did adapt the IRCCM to be artificially nerfed into one of the existing types modeled in-game, the Python 4 would still be too powerful because of it’s kinematics, what will the other nations do?”
Would it really be OP? It’s an IR missile in an ARH meta. Yes, it would be pretty amazing kinematically. But in terms of tight close range maneuvering, we already have R-73s and Magic-2s that can pull off insane shots. At longer ranges, you have a massive amount of time to still easily defeat both IRCCM methods. It’s undeniably a step up in power, obviously, that’s why we want it. But hardly gamebreaking in the current meta.
This notion that all nations have to have exact counterparts at all times to balance each other has almost never held true. The addition of modern ARH missiles to every nation in the same patch is the only example I can think of where Gaijin really pulled it off well. I could sit here all day listing out each time the meta was unbalanced after the latest addition for whatever nation. The MICA currently stands out as a shining example of my point, as the only ARH with an improved seeker, despite more advanced variants of missiles in the form of AIM-120C5 and R-77-1 having been added since then.
The power level of top tier has surged immensely with the addition of Eurofighters, Rafales, SU-30s, and F-15Es. Are we really going to pretend that adding an IR missile that turns hard and goes kinda far to a plane with mediocre flight performance and a noticeably disadvantaged number of missile hardpoints is somehow going to rock the world of top tier Air RB in 2025?
It’s been in the files for two entire years, there’s clearly been some level of consideration. Add it for the Sufa with balanced IRCCM. Make it a worthwhile and unique addition to the tech tree and not completely DOA in the world of 14.0+. Thanks for your consideration.
you know what? I ABSOLUTLY FKN AGREE WITH THIS THANK GOD YOU SAID EVERYTHING I WANTED TO SAY FOR A LONG TIME MAN! WELL FKN DONE. THE EXCUSES ARE DRAINING OUT THE TRUTH ITS FINALLY EXPOSED.