or the R-24R/T on the MLD…
Quite literally made top tier air rb unplayable for a few months
2 Likes
9b when it was first introduced
??? The performance of the R-74M at flight is the same as that of the R-73. What has changed is the seeker, and it is not me who says so, but the manufacturer itself, which states that the R-74M is a modernised version of the R-73. I do not understant , The difference in flight capacity will only be achieved in the R-74M2. I recommend that you and the Devs confirm the information about armament, because what is being debated here is something that cuts across NATO countries. Do you really believe that the R-73 is comparable to the Aim-9M, and then you send a cod into the air as if the R-74M were different from the R-73 in flight? Funny.
2 Likes
Currently as it is, the F-16I is just an extra 400k RP before getting to the best attacker in the Israeli tree, the F-15I. It serves no purpose other than that.
For air RB, both the F-16C and F-16D are better and for GRB it only offers a marginal advantage over those with the SPICE-250 while still being inferior to the F-15I. (like seriously, Litening II for the Sufa??? Come on)
If it got the LITENING V or if this report got accepted allowing for 16 SPICE-250s, the Sufa may become viable Community Bug Reporting System
2 Likes
i use the c10 in ground rb
and will continue to use untill they add the lavi
1 Like
Whatever you uploaded failed
Also source for the other pics?
Fixed I think
1 Like
Roe website for performance and Ukraine arsenal company for seekerhead
Link?
Also 60G seems to be referring to dual plane and I don’t know if the R-73 has constant dual plane
R73 or r74? R73 stats is just that brochure, lemme get the links to the others
1 Like
To the R74 thingy
1 Like
Here is of Ukrainian brochure for seekerhead
Here is r74m website
Spoiler
Why should Russia and Israel be the only countries to get better ir missiles?
dont know about the russian part but israel’s point been said here numerous times
Russia doesn’t need it, but the reasons for the Sufa have been discussed multiple times in this thread.
It’s currently sitting at 14.0 and is immensely underpowered compared to everything else at the BR and honestly worse than a large portion of existing 13.7s. That’s why it would need a new more powerful IR missile. Other nations have their unique advantages. The SU-30 is an insane spam machine, the MICA with or without the Rafale is crazy good compared to all the other ARHs, all the nations with Eurofighter have that comically overpowered UFOmobile, etc. See my other posts for why an IR missile with IRCCM adapted to be comparable to existing additions isn’t broken.
6 Likes
I agree but the problem is that gaijin adds nations equivalents when they add a new generation of misssiles. Irccm fox 2s, all aspect fox 2s, modern fox 3s also follow this trend. The problem is that there’s only 2 nations that have a missile of similar capabilities, Russia and Israel. Therefore, it would be unfair to only give better missiles to only those 2 nations, and therefore they’re going to wait until either next gen ir misiles where everyone will have parity or they just not add them at all
and then we have the matchbet, which has been the israeli top tier aa up untill 3 months ago while russia been using the pantsir
and even then the spyder is missing so many features and the missiles cant even fly straight it is practically just a 3d model of the spyder while russians get an even stronger aa
2 Likes
Ground balancing has little to do with air balancing
you are missing the point, we are quite past fairness
1 Like