Put the Mi-4AV in 7.7 to get matched with 7.7 tanks and not APFSDS rounds

Game Discussion Realistic Battle
,
21

I think you’re grossly overestimating the capabilities of SPAAG’s that will be in 6.7 players lineups.

Many countries have AA gaps and are forced to bring up AA’s from as low as 5.3, or heck, in Israel’s case 4.3, up into their 6.7 lineups.

Ain’t no way you’re consistently sniping AGM’s with something like a Skink, Zestorer or TCM20.

And even if your aiming hand is guided by god himself, it’s still not changing the fact you can do nothing to actually hurt the Mi4 who can just land, rearm, and start spamming missiles again. He only needs to get lucky once, whereas the AA in this CIWS cope scenario has to get lucky every single time just to stay alive.

22

dude, kugelblitz is in 7.0, even if the Mi-4AV stills in 8.0, the kugel will fight against early helis…

23

so even in the current br, WW2 AAAs will fight against modern vehicles.

24

But you’re asking for Mi4 to face 6.7. So I’m telling you what AA’s exist in a 6.7 lineup - and why they’re completely inadequate to fight Mi4.

25

Have you used Cool Girl before? It has no zoom, and anything past 1.5km is the size of a pixel. How do you hit helis that are past 2km? the good SPAA at 6.7-7.7 is the Shilka, great zoom, fully stabilized and dish out great shell volume, but its not going to fight it since they are on the same side. M163 is crap that’s why its 7.3 now

26

the zoom of the Mi-4AV is like the zoom of the Kugel, dude.
i can’t see a thing passed the 2km, so if the missile can be launched at 4km, u need to have the aim of a sniper to hit something at 4km

27

?, AB 205 A-1, UH-1B, and AH-1G/Tzefa A literally dont have missiles

28

yeah, but they have better maneuverability and can turn better than the Mi-4AV, so it gets compensated by the reason they don’t have missiles

29

not aaaall the helicopters have missiles, but the ones that have missiles are pretty shit maneuvering, or their top speed is pretty low

30

okay, go kill someone with the AB205s clearly really good maneuverability and 14 might mouse rockets

31

also everything else with missiles is 8.3, the Mi4 gets to be 8.0 because its got bad maneuverability it doesn’t need to go down more

32

When have you ever seen a Gepard take down a missile? It’s near impossible for a SPAA without proxy rounds to do this. Especially with the massively off-center guns. Either you have never played SPAA or you are knowingly lying.

1 Like
33

PGZ09 is the lowest br one that could manage it but the other day I’ve spam >100 bullets and still failed to detonate that one missile launched by Hunter lol

34

XM 276 be like: IM HERE TO SOLVE THAT PROBLEM :D

35

Talk is easy lol have you actually done that? we can do custom battle to test it out if you want, to see how consistently you can intercept incoming missiles with your SPAAs without HEVT/AHEAD, let’s go. Gepard having a lot of issues taking down a scout drone in orbit flight, you think they can take down incoming missiles that the radar has problem locking them?

1 Like
36

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

1 Like
37

Are you like Vamilads alt that solely focuses on Russian tech instead of american?

First you post about MLD suffering, now you want Mi-4V at 7.7.

38

it has 4 missiles, and they are falangas, so no. If they were malyutkas and only 2, why not.

39

i think u never read the rules of WT Forums, no?

40

dude, russia is pretty nerfed in their lowtier vehicles.
the IS-4M is a WW2 tank that fights against HEAT-FS rounds, and it isn’t even op!
the T-10M is like meh…
and the T-62 and Object 435 are decent but have their cons.
so yes, russia should get some br changes in their vehicles.

PD: knowing that Gaijin isn’t going to make discompression making 16.0 and doing massive br changes, all i can do is to say that they need br changes in the current 14.0/12.7