not more?
USA: all balanced, very good at practically all
Germany: extremely good, their tanks are the goat and the planes are absurdly ez to play
GB: non-explosive AP rounds, but a lot of armor and good reloads, and their planes are so op, like the lancaster or the jas 39
Japan: very bad lowtier tanks, but 4segs reload at toptier and almost the best planes of the game
China: almost copy-paste nation, but good tanks at all ranks and the planes are just too op, the J-10A is one of the best dogfighters of the game
Italy: good tanks at all ranks, they are like paper but their cannons are very good, and the planes are probably better than the german ones
France: the most OP nation, solid AP rounds but with a lot of armor, and some of their tanks can take a lot of shots before getting destroyed
Sweden: again, the most OP nation at all ranks, APDS at 1.0 and the Strv-103 is unbeatable from the front
Israel: meh, America copy-paste
but Russia? yeah, very good tanks at almost all ranks, but some of their planes suck in their own job, and the tanks of midtier are probably impossible to play against same br tanks
and yeah, i took the time to write ALL that shit to respond ur stupid comment.
so yes, if i need to go to the limit, i will go to the limit, i don’t actually care cuz i just want to balance the game for everyone, not just for “russian players”
u never insulted me? i never saw u being “pacific” with me in other post, like the “F/A-18A ruined 11.7”
or other things like that.
so if u don’t treat me like a real person, then i don’t have any reasons to treat u like a real person
I never insulted you in that thread, and I am sure because I just went back and read through it. The closest I got to being “insulting” was me asking you if you just warp everything because you kept saying things that weren’t related to what I was saying
I think he means the IS-3, there where un-confirmed reports in Germany of a new Russian heavy tank on the Eastern front, then during the 1st V-day parade 4 months after Germanys surrender these guys showed up (at 6:06):
52 of them, so they where well into production by the end of the war even if none of the serial production ones made it to the front in time.
And I suspect that the “un-confirmed reports” where likely combat trials of the pre-production IS-3s, much like how the USA tested the P-80 in Italy.
IS-4 was also in development, but didn’t go into production until 1946
So to summarize, the IS-3 is not a ww2 tank because zero confirmations exist of it being in combat, it was introduced into service basically at the caboose of WW2, and 95% of its service history exists post ww2.
the IS-3 was made to fight against Tiger 2 (H) cuz it had a lot of angled armor, so the USSR needed less money to do a more armored tank and they saved money
It entered service in WW2 regardless of whether or not it saw battle. But I’m not going to start a fight over it, I’m just explaining what I think he meant, you can make up your own mind whether it qualifies or not.
The Maus actually did see combat, the 2nd prototype 205/2 was deployed into battle against the Red army to attempt to defend Kummersdorf before its crew destroyed it to prevent its capture.