Put the Mi-4AV in 7.7 to get matched with 7.7 tanks and not APFSDS rounds

okay, go kill someone with the AB205s clearly really good maneuverability and 14 might mouse rockets

also everything else with missiles is 8.3, the Mi4 gets to be 8.0 because its got bad maneuverability it doesn’t need to go down more

When have you ever seen a Gepard take down a missile? It’s near impossible for a SPAA without proxy rounds to do this. Especially with the massively off-center guns. Either you have never played SPAA or you are knowingly lying.

1 Like

PGZ09 is the lowest br one that could manage it but the other day I’ve spam >100 bullets and still failed to detonate that one missile launched by Hunter lol

XM 276 be like: IM HERE TO SOLVE THAT PROBLEM :D

Talk is easy lol have you actually done that? we can do custom battle to test it out if you want, to see how consistently you can intercept incoming missiles with your SPAAs without HEVT/AHEAD, let’s go. Gepard having a lot of issues taking down a scout drone in orbit flight, you think they can take down incoming missiles that the radar has problem locking them?

1 Like

Are you like Vamilads alt that solely focuses on Russian tech instead of american?

First you post about MLD suffering, now you want Mi-4V at 7.7.

it has 4 missiles, and they are falangas, so no. If they were malyutkas and only 2, why not.

i think u never read the rules of WT Forums, no?

dude, russia is pretty nerfed in their lowtier vehicles.
the IS-4M is a WW2 tank that fights against HEAT-FS rounds, and it isn’t even op!
the T-10M is like meh…
and the T-62 and Object 435 are decent but have their cons.
so yes, russia should get some br changes in their vehicles.

PD: knowing that Gaijin isn’t going to make discompression making 16.0 and doing massive br changes, all i can do is to say that they need br changes in the current 14.0/12.7

and other nations heavy tanks at 7.7 dont fight HEAT-FS rounds?

yeah, but they have better APHE shells or even HEAT-FS like the M103

and they have better armor and are faster than the IS-4M or other heavy tanks

what battle did the IS-4M and T-54 take part in?

huh?

What battle did it take part in?

8.3/8.7, and they suck there

What battle did the IS-4M and T-54 take part in during 1939-1945, the years World War Two took place?

they never fought in 1939/1945, but something is APDS and other thing is APFSDS
they fought (as i remember) in Cold War, but they were quickly replaced by the T-10M, T-55 and other vehicles

My point is these are exclusively cold war vehicles, not ww2. Please stop framing them like they are Tiger 2s and IS-2s when they bare more resemblance in time frame to the M46/M47 Patton and the M103/Conqueror.