Put the F-2A ADTW at 12.7 or keep it at 13.0 and give AIM-7P's

I’m trying to enjoy the game man not realismmaxxing it I don’t care if the F-15 was made for BVR I’m not going to do BVR with it.

BVR isn’t fun nothing about it interests me in the slightest I gave it more than 10 chances

An AESA radar that you can’t take advantage of

I don’t BVR in the F-15 either.

Most engagements are WVR, not BVR.

WVR capability is more important than bvr

Everyone and their mother do BVR with the golden eagle

nah i load up four sidewinders and do BFM like a true ace combat protag

Will they do well that way? No.
It’s just a waste of missiles

Not when it comes to hitting me

Also some maps have the absolute worst terrain known to man you can’t even multipath on them

Further confirming your skill issue

ok so don’t multipath

1 Like

Yeah, that’s one of the many flaws of multipathing.

You know this is a flaw, yet you consciously choose to ignore it

cat-cry

How did this conversation go from the AIM-7M’s that don’t belong to the F-2A ADTW and a nonexistent “Early” F/A-18C to how a missile behaves

Average WT player conversation.

It’s how it goes

1 Like

@YigitCanAydin
yigit

5 Likes

If you want to make more fun of me check my service record

Tbh this is not even a striction on these days.

MKM is the best example in this case, Malaysian Air Force never bought KH-38MT’s but here we are, same goes for German F4F that carries Aim-9J alongside with many more vehicles.

If ADTW is capable of carrying Aim-7P there is nothing stops to gaijin to add it, unless they dont want to.

1 Like

The J/ARG-1 is not NATO standard, neither is JDCS(F) interface carried by the F-2, or its other proprietary datalink system.

The F-2 has gotten nato standard Link-16 more recently, but Im unaware of if the Aim-7P actually uses it or something else.

3 Likes

Stop advocating for further ruining of the game by compressing the game even further just because you’re experiencing compression.