Some vehicles doesn’t feel like should be at their current battle rating and should get some updates making more balanced matches.
If you have some suggestions feel free to recommend, I will update the topic with good suggestions.
- USA
- M1A2/M1A1 HC/M1A1 SA - 12.0 → 12.3
All Abrams are overperforming for its BR after its remodel, has everything that a 12.3 tank needs.
- Germany
-
Leopard 2a4 + DM-33
Its ammo is too weak for its BR considering as some other 10.7 have better armor and ammo. -
Boxer MGS - 10.3 → 10.0
After the adjusted reload rate on the Cockerill (5.0s to 7.5s) the boxer is a Radkampfwagen 90 with thermals but worst reload, not 10.3 worthy after this. -
EMBT - 12.7 → 11.7 and switch ammo to DM-33 or equivalent
Slower than an Leclerc, weaker turret armor than Leclercs (and 60mm turret ring armor only), switching its ammo to DM-33 and bringing it down would make it more viable, making it closer to a type 90 but slower, worst reload and better hull armor.
- USSR/Russia
- T-80UM2 - 11.7 → 11.3
It has no thermals at 11.7, a tank that doesn’t have it shouldn’t be able to play against toptier tanks. T-72B3 Arena sits at 11.0 with same levels of armor and thermals but worst reload and worst mobility.
- Britain
- Chieftan MK10 - 9.3 → 9.0
Has a worst engine compared to the Khalid but sits at the same BR. Its slow and doesnt have anything other than its ammo making it equivalent to vehicles at 9.3.
- Japan
- Harimau - 10.3 → 10.0
Same as the Boxer and CT-CV. After the adjusted reload rate on the Cockerill (5.0s to 7.5s) the Harimau is a Type 16 with worst reload, better turret and hull but still not 10.3 worthy after the reload update. Also should be shelved in the type 16.
- China
-
VT-4 - 12.3 → 11.7
China has better tanks at 11.7 (ZTZ-96B and AL KHALID) with more mobility and kind of the same level of armor, remember that the VT-4 has older era compared to the VT-4A1. -
VT-4A1 - 12.7 → 12.3/12.0
Has worst mobility and weaker armor compared to ztz99a but has aps for a BR increase to 12.7.
ZTZ-99A and M1A2T are better tanks to play, remember that ztz99a is at 12.3.
- Italy
-
CENTAURO 2 (P) - 12.3 → 12.0
Better engine, optics and has autoloader compared to Centauro 1 120 but its a lot bigger making it a bigger target, its autoloader makes it lose 1 crewmember and keeps the same reload time(ace crew vehicle) and its engine isn’t as big of a difference for the higher BR. -
Ariete AMV 12.3 → 12.0
Only difference being the motor from the other Arietes but not that big to make it a 0.7 BR difference.
If M1A2 sits at 12.0 it will still be a better tank than Ariete.
- France
- EMBT - 12.7 → 11.7 and switch ammo to DM-33 or equivalent
Same as the German. Slower than an Leclerc, weaker turret armor than Leclercs (and 60mm turret ring armor only), switching its ammo to DM-33 and bringing it down would make it more viable, making it closer to a type 90 but slower, worst reload and better hull armor.
- Sweden
- CT-CV 105HP - 10.0 → 9.7
Same as the Boxer and Harimau. After the adjusted reload rate on the Cockerill (5.0s to 7.5s) its not good for the BR, its a worst boxer mgs right now(bigger and slower).
- Israel
-
Sabra MK 1 - 10.0 → 9.7 - reason - too slow and armor will be still ineffective against 9.7 tanks, it can hold t-55am shot but has thermals, a nice reload and a good ammo. CM-11 is at 9.3 being almost the same but having worst armor and cannon.
-
Namer/Eitan - 11.3 → 10.7 or LT → TD
Too slow and heavy, its armor doesn’t work at the BR and has too little missiles. Giving it TD would make it be able to restock its missiles improving it or getting it down in BR would make it have worst enemies vehicles making the spike more effective.