Fair enough. I stopped grinding the vehicle once I saw it was limited to HOT-2, so you know the Mephisto more than I do. What I love about these support vehicles is their ability to perform at just about any BR. But at 8.7, apart from some M60/Magach, you’re rarely going to encounter ERA, so HOT-2 not the biggest issue there. I did notice the high-profile of the Mephisto when facing it, though.
Already have done so. Topics like this are good for some chit-chat. But Gaijin’s way of balancing via statistics and other means is sound, and they don’t need our help (most of the time) to do it.
Here’s your quote of something that has no relation to war thunder even. Nice strawman there. A 2.0 kd or kps is insanely easy to get, as I said, and you need literally the barest knowledge of maps to get that. Of course there are matches where you go 0-2, but then there are surely also matches where you go 6-0? Or 8-0? Those exist right? I have less than double your time spent on the game btw, so it isn’t unachievable. It’s also nice to see that you don’t know how to interpret stats, as, if you had actually looked at the variety of statistical measures the game provides you, you would have seen that I do not one death leave, I spawn air. The t80b, and for that matter, the russian vehicles and the majority of british vehicles on my front page are things that I spammed out when I was still very new. So, just as you have said to not take older vehicles into account but your newer ones such as chinese and israeli vehicles, don not take my older vehicles into account as I have imrpoved, just as you said. You still have not told me why statshark is unreliable, and, as I said, it draws its data from the game itself. Compare your and my kps, winrate, vehicle stats etc from statshark to the game and tell me if you find discrepancies. Also, on the comet, please stop lying. The next closest british vehicle has about 150 less matches played. It’s strange how you can mess up like that with the stats in front of you. The type 89 has the type 87 rcv 80 matches below it. Strange how you missed this too.
I do suggest maybe learning how to read people’s stats better. If you want I can give you some guidance on it. It’s also strange how you decide to bring a completely random person into this conversation? Like great that you two know each other but that does not matter. I also started by bringing up the physical attributes of the T29 and KTH which you seem to have forgotten.
Before you make baseless accusations, please check your facts. I very rarely squad up. Also, on the base of simply insulting me, imagine playing this game since the ~2013 and not being able to get a 3 kd anywhere on your front page. I also do not enjoy nor want to play higher tiers as the vehicles do not interest me.
It’s also really amusing how terrible players like you are trying to determine what makes a player good or not. Please feel free to reply, or you could get off the forums and go look for that elusive good kd.
I never insulted you, of course if you don’t think being called a clubber is an insult.
It’s weird how a good player like you have such a bad eyesight.
But you still played hundreds if not thousands of games at higher tiers, while barely making it positive on plenty of those vehicles.
Recreating T14 clubbing stats in higher tier vehicles seems kinda hard for such a skilled player like you, but you somehow claim people in lower tiers are better at the game. That’s a nice way to contradict yourself buddy.
Difference between me and you is that my stats don’t immediately vanish the moment I play something that’s not meta.
Unless you cant read.
I never said that. at all? @UniqueScorpions is a different person to me.
We have told you why its unreliable, again your choosing not to read other comments.
no you brought up the T29 has 3 .50 cals.
i brought up, mobility, reload, armour, turret traverses etc. I was the one to compare them when you flat out said the T29 was better.
How is it lying? the comet is actually sitting 145 battles above the spitfire mk24.
However i stated ground vehicles of the same rank.
in which the comet sits 288 battles higher.
I was comparing rank 7s not rank 5.6.7 .
Again read what i said before typing this malarky out.
now are literally not reading what people are saying, and accusing them of using “strawman” tactics in conversation.
Now you are here, insinuating others are
A. Lying
B. trying to use strawmen
C. Are catagorically wrong (when they arent)
D. Are also insulting others stats which was completely irrelevant to the original discussion
And finally, have taken this so far off topic youve literally killed the damn topic in teh first place.
Keep clubbing 4.7s though, that’s the only thing you’re good at.
Judging by your barely 1 K/D in plenty of stuff, I guess you can’t handle anything higher than WW2 unless it’s a meta vehicle.
So here in this image, the top vehicle is the comet 1, as you can see. The vehicle below it, the spitfire I was referring to, is, as stated, about 150 matches below it. See? The spitfire is british, and a vehicle. This is evidently hard to understand. I am unsure why you think I would bring a 7.0 plane into battle with an, at the time I last played it, 5.7 tank.
Right just for you, let’s go through rank 7 things I recently played. M1a1, a more than 4 kd. leopard 2k, fixing some stats on it, about a 3 kd. Ipm1, about a 3 kd. leopard 2a4 for italy, congrats just over a 1 kd. I am sure once I get it spaded it will quickly rise. Rad, about a 4kd even while it’s barely past stock. gepard 1a2, about a 3 kd. Vcc 80/30, about a 3 kd. Dardo, a about 0.2 kd, the single outlier. Let’s compare them to your recently played rank 7 tanks shall we? But hey all of these are obviously meta vehicles so let’s compare your stats in them? Or is everything I play a meta vehicle to you? Once again, trashcan talking, go look for that 3kd.
“You used the comet, on its own for a very long time some 300 battles more than any other british vehicle, that shows me youve been one deaht leaving with it.”
Your words buddy, do you forget what you say so quickly?
IPM1 sits hundreds of games bellow the M1A1 227 exactly.
The M1A1 at release was an absolute power house and stomped regularly. SAME as the standard M1.
Leopard 2K sat at an insanely oppressive BR and had thermals as well. Even my KD in it is good.
Its a pretty busted tank.
you have 124 more games in that than any other rank 7 german tank.
The fact your so obsessed with KD in a team based objective based game shows your egos went to your head mate.
Get out there on your own, play random battles and see how good your KD is.
All the same you goons that sit in squadrons like that, think your gods and that your word is law when it comes to the vehicles when majority of you farm up KD and ODL like mad so you dont look bad.
Then look harder, it’s not like I am non-existent. Also where did I say I run in a top squadron for tournaments??? And then secondly, why can’t I play solo? Is there some issue with that?
Dude I don’t care about him, he isn’t arguing. You seem to not like me here so idk you also seem to be unable to just leave? And my attitude is perfectly fine, thanks
